36 KiB
title | TARGET DECK | FILE TAGS | tags | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Relations | Obsidian::STEM | set::relation |
|
Overview
An ordered pair of x
and y
, denoted \langle x, y \rangle
, is defined as: \langle x, y \rangle = \{\{x\}, \{x, y\}\}
. We define the first coordinate of \langle x, y \rangle
to be x
and the second coordinate to be y
.
%%ANKI
Basic
How is an ordered pair of x
and y
denoted?
Back: \langle x, y \rangle
Reference: Herbert B. Enderton, Elements of Set Theory (New York: Academic Press, 1977).
END%%
%%ANKI
Basic
What property must any satisfactory definition of \langle x, y \rangle
satisfy?
Back: x
and y
, along with their order, are uniquely determined.
Reference: Herbert B. Enderton, Elements of Set Theory (New York: Academic Press, 1977).
END%%
%%ANKI Basic Which of ordered pairs or sets is more general? Back: Sets.
END%%
%%ANKI
Basic
What biconditional is used to prove the well-definedness of \langle x, y \rangle
?
Back: (\langle x, y \rangle = \langle u, v \rangle) \Leftrightarrow (x = u \land y = v)
Reference: Herbert B. Enderton, Elements of Set Theory (New York: Academic Press, 1977).
END%%
%%ANKI
Cloze
{\{1, 2\}
} is a set whereas {\langle 1, 2 \rangle
} is an ordered pair.
Reference: Herbert B. Enderton, Elements of Set Theory (New York: Academic Press, 1977).
END%%
%%ANKI
Basic
How is \langle x, y \rangle
most commonly defined?
Back: As \{\{x\}, \{x, y\}\}
.
Reference: “Cartesian Product,” in Wikipedia, April 17, 2024, https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Cartesian_product&oldid=1219343305.
END%%
%%ANKI Basic Who is usually attributed the most commonly used definition of an ordered pair? Back: Kazimierz Kuratowski. Reference: Herbert B. Enderton, Elements of Set Theory (New York: Academic Press, 1977).
END%%
%%ANKI
Basic
How is \{\{x\}, \{x, y\}\}
alternatively denoted?
Back: \langle x, y \rangle
Reference: Herbert B. Enderton, Elements of Set Theory (New York: Academic Press, 1977).
END%%
%%ANKI
Cloze
Well-definedness of ordered pairs: {\langle u, v \rangle = \langle x, y \rangle
} if and only if {u = x \land v = y
}.
Reference: Herbert B. Enderton, Elements of Set Theory (New York: Academic Press, 1977).
END%%
%%ANKI
Basic
What term is used to refer to x
in \langle x, y \rangle
?
Back: The first coordinate.
Reference: Herbert B. Enderton, Elements of Set Theory (New York: Academic Press, 1977).
END%%
%%ANKI
Cloze
y
is the {second} coordinate of \langle x, y \rangle
.
Reference: Herbert B. Enderton, Elements of Set Theory (New York: Academic Press, 1977).
END%%
%%ANKI
Basic
Is \varnothing
a relation?
Back: Yes.
Reference: Herbert B. Enderton, Elements of Set Theory (New York: Academic Press, 1977).
END%%
A relation R
is a set of ordered pairs. The domain of R
(\mathop{\text{dom}}{R}
), the range of R
(\mathop{\text{ran}}{R}
), and the field of R
(\mathop{\text{fld}}{R}
) is defined as:
x \in \mathop{\text{dom}}{R} \Leftrightarrow \exists y, \langle x, y \rangle \in R
x \in \mathop{\text{ran}}{R} \Leftrightarrow \exists t, \langle t, x \rangle \in R
\mathop{\text{fld}}{R} = \mathop{\text{dom}}{R} \cup \mathop{\text{ran}}{R}
%%ANKI Basic What is a relation? Back: A set of ordered pairs. Reference: Herbert B. Enderton, Elements of Set Theory (New York: Academic Press, 1977).
END%%
%%ANKI Basic Are relations or sets the more general concept? Back: Sets. Reference: Herbert B. Enderton, Elements of Set Theory (New York: Academic Press, 1977).
END%%
%%ANKI
Basic
How is the ordering relation <
on \{2, 3, 5\}
defined?
Back: As set \{\langle 2, 3\rangle, \langle 2, 5 \rangle, \langle 3, 5 \rangle\}
.
Reference: Herbert B. Enderton, Elements of Set Theory (New York: Academic Press, 1977).
END%%
%%ANKI
Basic
How is the ordering relation <
on \{2, 3, 5\}
visualized?
Back:
!
Reference: Herbert B. Enderton, Elements of Set Theory (New York: Academic Press, 1977).
END%%
%%ANKI Basic A relation is a set of ordered pairs with what additional restriction? Back: N/A. Reference: Herbert B. Enderton, Elements of Set Theory (New York: Academic Press, 1977).
END%%
%%ANKI
Cloze
For relation R
, {xRy
} is alternative notation for {\langle x, y \rangle \in R
}.
Reference: Herbert B. Enderton, Elements of Set Theory (New York: Academic Press, 1977).
END%%
%%ANKI
Basic
How is ordering relation <
on set \mathbb{R}
defined using set-builder notation?
Back: As \{\langle x, y\rangle \in \mathbb{R} \times \mathbb{R} \mid x \text{ is less than } y\}
.
Reference: Herbert B. Enderton, Elements of Set Theory (New York: Academic Press, 1977).
END%%
%%ANKI
Basic
How is x < y
rewritten to emphasize that <
is a relation?
Back: \langle x, y \rangle \in \;<
Reference: Herbert B. Enderton, Elements of Set Theory (New York: Academic Press, 1977).
END%%
%%ANKI
Basic
How is the identity relation on \omega
defined using set-builder notation?
Back: \{\langle n, n \rangle \mid n \in \omega\}
Reference: Herbert B. Enderton, Elements of Set Theory (New York: Academic Press, 1977).
END%%
%%ANKI
Basic
How is the domain of relation R
denoted?
Back: \mathop{\text{dom}}{R}
Reference: Herbert B. Enderton, Elements of Set Theory (New York: Academic Press, 1977).
END%%
%%ANKI
Basic
How is the domain of relation R
defined?
Back: x \in \mathop{\text{dom}}{R} \Leftrightarrow \exists y, \langle x, y \rangle \in R
Reference: Herbert B. Enderton, Elements of Set Theory (New York: Academic Press, 1977).
END%%
%%ANKI
Basic
What is the most general mathematical object the \mathop{\text{dom}}
operation can be applied to?
Back: Sets.
Reference: Herbert B. Enderton, Elements of Set Theory (New York: Academic Press, 1977).
END%%
%%ANKI
Basic
Let A
be a set containing no ordered pairs. What is \mathop{\text{dom}} A
?
Back: \varnothing
Reference: Herbert B. Enderton, Elements of Set Theory (New York: Academic Press, 1977).
END%%
%%ANKI
Basic
Let A = \{\{\{x\}, \{x, y\}\}, \{z\}\}
. What is \mathop{\text{dom}} A
?
Back: \{x\}
Reference: Herbert B. Enderton, Elements of Set Theory (New York: Academic Press, 1977).
END%%
%%ANKI
Cloze
For any set \mathscr{A}
, \mathop{\text{dom}}\bigcup\mathscr{A}
{=
} \bigcup\, \{\mathop{\text{dom}} R \mid R \in \mathscr{A}\}
.
Reference: Herbert B. Enderton, Elements of Set Theory (New York: Academic Press, 1977).
END%%
%%ANKI
Basic
The following is analagous to what logical expression of commuting quantifiers?\mathop{\text{dom}}\bigcup\mathscr{A} = \bigcup, {\mathop{\text{dom}} R \mid R \in \mathscr{A}}
Back:
\exists x, \exists y, P(x, y) \Leftrightarrow \exists y, \exists x, P(x, y)
Reference: Herbert B. Enderton, Elements of Set Theory (New York: Academic Press, 1977).
END%%
%%ANKI
Cloze
For any set \mathscr{A}
, \mathop{\text{dom}}\bigcap\mathscr{A}
{\subseteq
} \bigcap\, \{\mathop{\text{dom}} R \mid R \in \mathscr{A}\}
.
Reference: Herbert B. Enderton, Elements of Set Theory (New York: Academic Press, 1977).
END%%
%%ANKI
Basic
The following is analagous to what logical expression of commuting quantifiers? \mathop{\text{dom}}\bigcap\mathscr{A} \subseteq \bigcap, {\mathop{\text{dom}} R \mid R \in \mathscr{A}}
Back:
\exists x, \forall y, P(x, y) \Rightarrow \forall y, \exists x, P(x, y)
Reference: Herbert B. Enderton, Elements of Set Theory (New York: Academic Press, 1977).
END%%
%%ANKI
Cloze
For any set \mathscr{A}
, \mathop{\text{ran}}\bigcup\mathscr{A}
{=
} \bigcup\, \{\mathop{\text{ran}} R \mid R \in \mathscr{A}\}
.
Reference: Herbert B. Enderton, Elements of Set Theory (New York: Academic Press, 1977).
END%%
%%ANKI
Basic
The following is analagous to what predicate logical expression of commuting quantifiers? \mathop{\text{ran}}\bigcup\mathscr{A} = \bigcup, {\mathop{\text{ran}} R \mid R \in \mathscr{A}}
Back:
\exists x, \exists y, P(x, y) \Leftrightarrow \exists y, \exists x, P(x, y)
Reference: Herbert B. Enderton, Elements of Set Theory (New York: Academic Press, 1977).
END%%
%%ANKI
Cloze
For any set \mathscr{A}
, \mathop{\text{ran}}\bigcap\mathscr{A}
{\subseteq
} \bigcap\, \{\mathop{\text{ran}} R \mid R \in \mathscr{A}\}
.
Reference: Herbert B. Enderton, Elements of Set Theory (New York: Academic Press, 1977).
END%%
%%ANKI
Basic
The following is analagous to what logical expression of commuting quantifiers? \mathop{\text{ran}}\bigcap\mathscr{A} \subseteq \bigcap, {\mathop{\text{ran}} R \mid R \in \mathscr{A}}
Back:
\exists x, \forall y, P(x, y) \Rightarrow \forall y, \exists x, P(x, y)
Reference: Herbert B. Enderton, Elements of Set Theory (New York: Academic Press, 1977).
END%%
%%ANKI
Basic
How is the range of relation R
denoted?
Back: \mathop{\text{ran}}{R}
Reference: Herbert B. Enderton, Elements of Set Theory (New York: Academic Press, 1977).
END%%
%%ANKI
Basic
How is the range of relation R
defined?
Back: x \in \mathop{\text{ran}}{R} \Leftrightarrow \exists t, \langle t, x \rangle \in R
Reference: Herbert B. Enderton, Elements of Set Theory (New York: Academic Press, 1977).
END%%
%%ANKI
Basic
What is the most general mathematical object the \mathop{\text{ran}}
operation can be applied to?
Back: Sets.
Reference: Herbert B. Enderton, Elements of Set Theory (New York: Academic Press, 1977).
END%%
%%ANKI
Basic
Let A
be a set containing no ordered pairs. What is \mathop{\text{ran}} A
?
Back: \varnothing
Reference: Herbert B. Enderton, Elements of Set Theory (New York: Academic Press, 1977).
END%%
%%ANKI
Basic
Let A = \{\{\{x\}, \{x, y\}\}, \{z\}\}
. What is \mathop{\text{ran}} A
?
Back: \{y\}
Reference: Herbert B. Enderton, Elements of Set Theory (New York: Academic Press, 1977).
END%%
%%ANKI
Basic
How is the field of relation R
denoted?
Back: \mathop{\text{fld}}{R}
Reference: Herbert B. Enderton, Elements of Set Theory (New York: Academic Press, 1977).
END%%
%%ANKI
Basic
How is the field of relation R
defined?
Back: \mathop{\text{fld}}{R} = \mathop{\text{dom}}{R} \cup \mathop{\text{ran}}{R}
Reference: Herbert B. Enderton, Elements of Set Theory (New York: Academic Press, 1977).
END%%
%%ANKI
Basic
Let A = \{\{\{x\}, \{x, y\}\}, \{z\}\}
. What is \mathop{\text{fld}} A
?
Back: \{x, y\}
Reference: Herbert B. Enderton, Elements of Set Theory (New York: Academic Press, 1977).
END%%
%%ANKI
Basic
If \langle x, y \rangle \in A
, what sets are in \bigcup A
?
Back: \{x\}
and \{x, y\}
.
Reference: Herbert B. Enderton, Elements of Set Theory (New York: Academic Press, 1977).
END%%
%%ANKI
Basic
If \langle x, y \rangle \in A
, what sets are in \bigcup \bigcup A
?
Back: x
and y
.
Reference: Herbert B. Enderton, Elements of Set Theory (New York: Academic Press, 1977).
END%%
%%ANKI
Basic
What is the most general mathematical object the \mathop{\text{fld}}
operation can be applied to?
Back: Sets.
Reference: Herbert B. Enderton, Elements of Set Theory (New York: Academic Press, 1977).
END%%
%%ANKI
Basic
\mathop{\text{fld}} R = \bigcup \bigcup R
is necessary for what condition?
Back: R
is a relation.
Reference: Herbert B. Enderton, Elements of Set Theory (New York: Academic Press, 1977).
END%%
A set A
is single-valued iff for each x
in \mathop{\text{dom}}A
, there is only one y
such that xAy
. A set A
is single-rooted iff for each y \in \mathop{\text{ran}}A
, there is only one x
such that xAy
.
%%ANKI
Basic
What does it mean for a set A
to be "single-valued"?
Back: For each x \in \mathop{\text{dom}}A
, there exists a unique y
such that xAy
.
Reference: Herbert B. Enderton, Elements of Set Theory (New York: Academic Press, 1977).
END%%
%%ANKI
Basic
What does it mean for a set A
to be "single-rooted"?
Back: For each y \in \mathop{\text{ran}}A
, there exists a unique x
such that xAy
.
Reference: Herbert B. Enderton, Elements of Set Theory (New York: Academic Press, 1977).
END%%
%%ANKI
Cloze
For any binary relation R
, R \subseteq
{1:\mathop{\text{dom} }R
} \times
{1:\mathop{\text{ran} }R
} \subseteq
{2:\mathop{\text{fld} }R
} \times
{2:\mathop{\text{fld} }R
}.
Reference: Herbert B. Enderton, Elements of Set Theory (New York: Academic Press, 1977).
END%%
n-ary Relations
We define ordered triples as \langle x, y, z \rangle = \langle \langle x, y \rangle, z \rangle
. We define ordered quadruples as \langle x_1, x_2, x_3, x_4 \rangle = \langle \langle \langle x_1, x_2 \rangle, x_3 \rangle, x_4 \rangle
. This idea generalizes to n
-tuples. As a special case, we define the 1
-tuple \langle x \rangle = x
.
An n
-ary relation on A
is a set of ordered n
-tuples with all components in A
. Keep in mind though, a unary (1
-ary) relation on A
is just a subset of A
and may not be a relation at all.
%%ANKI
Basic
Ordered triple \langle x, y, z \rangle
is "syntactic sugar" for what?
Back: \langle \langle x, y \rangle, z \rangle
Reference: Herbert B. Enderton, Elements of Set Theory (New York: Academic Press, 1977).
END%%
%%ANKI
Basic
Ordered quadruple \langle x_1, x_2, x_3, x_4 \rangle
is "syntactic sugar" for what?
Back: \langle \langle \langle x_1, x_2 \rangle, x_3 \rangle, x_4 \rangle
Reference: Herbert B. Enderton, Elements of Set Theory (New York: Academic Press, 1977).
END%%
%%ANKI
Basic
A 1
-tuple \langle x \rangle
is "syntactic sugar" for what?
Back: x
Reference: Herbert B. Enderton, Elements of Set Theory (New York: Academic Press, 1977).
END%%
%%ANKI
Basic
What simpler construct are n
-tuples constructed from?
Back: Ordered pairs.
Reference: Herbert B. Enderton, Elements of Set Theory (New York: Academic Press, 1977).
END%%
%%ANKI
Basic
Are n
-tuples defined in a left- or right-associative way?
Back: Left-associative.
Reference: Herbert B. Enderton, Elements of Set Theory (New York: Academic Press, 1977).
END%%
%%ANKI
Basic
What is an n
-tuple?
Back: A left-associative nesting of n
elements as ordered pairs.
Reference: Herbert B. Enderton, Elements of Set Theory (New York: Academic Press, 1977).
END%%
%%ANKI
Basic
What is an n
-ary relation on A
?
Back: A set of ordered n
-tuples with all components in A
.
Reference: Herbert B. Enderton, Elements of Set Theory (New York: Academic Press, 1977).
END%%
%%ANKI
Basic
What does it mean for a relation to be on some set A
?
Back: The components of the relation's members are members of A
.
Reference: Herbert B. Enderton, Elements of Set Theory (New York: Academic Press, 1977).
END%%
%%ANKI
Basic
A 2
-ary relation on A
is a subset of what Cartesian product?
Back: A \times A
Reference: Herbert B. Enderton, Elements of Set Theory (New York: Academic Press, 1977).
END%%
%%ANKI
Basic
A 1
-ary relation on A
is a subset of what Cartesian product?
Back: N/A
Reference: Herbert B. Enderton, Elements of Set Theory (New York: Academic Press, 1977).
END%%
%%ANKI
Basic
A 3
-ary relation on A
is a subset of what Cartesian product?
Back: (A \times A) \times A
Reference: Herbert B. Enderton, Elements of Set Theory (New York: Academic Press, 1977).
END%%
%%ANKI
Basic
What terminological quirk exists with respect to n
-ary relations on A
?
Back: A 1
-ary relation on A
may not be a relation at all.
Reference: Herbert B. Enderton, Elements of Set Theory (New York: Academic Press, 1977).
END%%
%%ANKI
Basic
A 1
-ary relation on A
is a subset of what?
Back: A
Reference: Herbert B. Enderton, Elements of Set Theory (New York: Academic Press, 1977).
END%%
%%ANKI
Basic
For what values of n
is an "n
-ary relation on A
" a "relation"?
Back: n > 1
Reference: Herbert B. Enderton, Elements of Set Theory (New York: Academic Press, 1977).
END%%
%%ANKI
Basic
For what values of n
is an "n
-ary relation on A
" not a "relation"?
Back: Potentially when n = 1
.
Reference: Herbert B. Enderton, Elements of Set Theory (New York: Academic Press, 1977).
END%%
%%ANKI
Basic
What is n
in term "n
-ary relation on A
"?
Back: A positive integer.
Reference: Herbert B. Enderton, Elements of Set Theory (New York: Academic Press, 1977).
END%%
%%ANKI
Basic
Which of "n
-ary relations on A
" and "relations" is more general?
Back: Relations.
Reference: Herbert B. Enderton, Elements of Set Theory (New York: Academic Press, 1977).
END%%
%%ANKI
Basic
Is \{\langle x \rangle, \langle x, y \rangle, \langle x, y, z \rangle\}
a relation?
Back: Indeterminate.
Reference: Herbert B. Enderton, Elements of Set Theory (New York: Academic Press, 1977).
END%%
%%ANKI
Basic
What must be true for \{\langle x \rangle, \langle x, y \rangle, \langle x, y, z \rangle\}
to be a relation?
Back: x
must be an ordered pair.
Reference: Herbert B. Enderton, Elements of Set Theory (New York: Academic Press, 1977).
END%%
%%ANKI
Basic
Why isn't \{\langle \varnothing \rangle, \langle \varnothing, \varnothing \rangle, \langle \varnothing, \varnothing, \varnothing \rangle\}
a relation?
Back: \langle \varnothing \rangle = \varnothing
is not an ordered pair.
Reference: Herbert B. Enderton, Elements of Set Theory (New York: Academic Press, 1977).
END%%
%%ANKI
Basic
Is \{\langle x, y \rangle, \langle x, y, z \rangle\}
a relation?
Back: Yes.
Reference: Herbert B. Enderton, Elements of Set Theory (New York: Academic Press, 1977).
END%%
%%ANKI
Basic
Let x, y, z \in A
. Is \{\langle x, y \rangle, \langle x, y, z \rangle\}
a 2
-ary relation on A
?
Back: No.
Reference: Herbert B. Enderton, Elements of Set Theory (New York: Academic Press, 1977).
END%%
%%ANKI
Basic
Let x, y, z \in A
. Why isn't \{\langle x, y \rangle, \langle x, y, z \rangle\}
a 2
-ary relation on A
?
Back: Because \langle x, y, z \rangle \not\in A \times A
.
Reference: Herbert B. Enderton, Elements of Set Theory (New York: Academic Press, 1977).
END%%
%%ANKI
Basic
Let x, y, z \in A
. Is \{\langle x, y \rangle, \langle x, y, z \rangle\}
a 3
-ary relation on A
?
Back: No.
Reference: Herbert B. Enderton, Elements of Set Theory (New York: Academic Press, 1977).
END%%
%%ANKI
Basic
Let x, y, z \in A
. Why isn't \{\langle x, y \rangle, \langle x, y, z \rangle\}
a 3
-ary relation on A
?
Back: Because \langle x, y \rangle \not\in (A \times A) \times A
.
Reference: Herbert B. Enderton, Elements of Set Theory (New York: Academic Press, 1977).
END%%
Equivalence Relations
Given relation R
and set A
, R
is an equivalence relation on A
iff R
is a binary relation on A
that is reflexive on A
, symmetric, and transitive:
R
is reflexive onA
ifxRx
for allx \in A
.R
is symmetric if wheneverxRy
, thenyRx
.R
is transitive if wheneverxRy
andyRz
, thenxRz
.
%%ANKI
Cloze
Binary relation R
is {reflexive on A
} iff {xRx
for all x \in A
}.
Reference: Herbert B. Enderton, Elements of Set Theory (New York: Academic Press, 1977).
END%%
%%ANKI
Basic
Why is it incorrect to ask if R
is reflexive?
Back: We have to ask if R
is reflexive on some reference set.
Reference: Herbert B. Enderton, Elements of Set Theory (New York: Academic Press, 1977).
END%%
%%ANKI
Basic
Given R = \{\langle a, a \rangle, \langle b, c \rangle\}
, is R
reflexive?
Back: N/A. The question must provide a reference set.
Reference: Herbert B. Enderton, Elements of Set Theory (New York: Academic Press, 1977).
END%%
%%ANKI
Basic
Given R = \{\langle a, a \rangle, \langle b, c \rangle\}
, is R
reflexive on a
?
Back: N/A. We must ask if R
is reflexive on a set.
Reference: Herbert B. Enderton, Elements of Set Theory (New York: Academic Press, 1977).
END%%
%%ANKI
Basic
Given R = \{\langle a, a \rangle, \langle b, c \rangle\}
, is R
reflexive on \{a\}
?
Back: Yes.
Reference: Herbert B. Enderton, Elements of Set Theory (New York: Academic Press, 1977).
END%%
%%ANKI
Basic
Given R = \{\langle a, a \rangle, \langle b, c \rangle\}
, is R
reflexive on \{a, b\}
?
Back: No.
Reference: Herbert B. Enderton, Elements of Set Theory (New York: Academic Press, 1977).
END%%
%%ANKI
Basic
Given R = \{\langle a, a \rangle, \langle b, c \rangle\}
, why isn't R
reflexive on \{a, b\}
?
Back: Because \langle b, b \rangle \not\in R
.
Reference: Herbert B. Enderton, Elements of Set Theory (New York: Academic Press, 1977).
END%%
%%ANKI
Cloze
If xRx
for all x \in A
, R
is said to be reflexive {on} A
.
Reference: Herbert B. Enderton, Elements of Set Theory (New York: Academic Press, 1977).
END%%
%%ANKI
Cloze
Binary relation R
is {symmetric} iff {xRy \Rightarrow yRx
}.
Reference: Herbert B. Enderton, Elements of Set Theory (New York: Academic Press, 1977).
END%%
%%ANKI
Basic
Given R = \{\langle a, b \rangle, \langle b, c \rangle\}
, is R
symmetric?
Back: No.
Reference: Herbert B. Enderton, Elements of Set Theory (New York: Academic Press, 1977).
END%%
%%ANKI
Basic
Given R = \{\langle a, b \rangle, \langle b, c \rangle\}
, what additional member(s) must be added to make R
symmetric?
Back: \langle b, a \rangle
and \langle c, b \rangle
.
Reference: Herbert B. Enderton, Elements of Set Theory (New York: Academic Press, 1977).
END%%
%%ANKI
Basic
Given R = \{\langle a, a \rangle, \langle b, b \rangle\}
, which of reflexivity (on \{a, b\}
), symmetry, and transitivity does R
exhibit?
Back: Reflexivity on \{a, b\}
and symmetry.
Reference: Herbert B. Enderton, Elements of Set Theory (New York: Academic Press, 1977).
END%%
%%ANKI
Cloze
Binary relation R
is {transitive} iff {xRy \land yRz \Rightarrow xRz
}.
Reference: Herbert B. Enderton, Elements of Set Theory (New York: Academic Press, 1977).
END%%
%%ANKI
Basic
Given R = \{\langle a, b \rangle, \langle b, c \rangle\}
, is R
transitive?
Back: No.
Reference: Herbert B. Enderton, Elements of Set Theory (New York: Academic Press, 1977).
END%%
%%ANKI
Basic
Given R = \{\langle a, b \rangle, \langle b, c \rangle\}
, what additional member(s) must be added to make R
transitive?
Back: Just \langle a, c \rangle
.
Reference: Herbert B. Enderton, Elements of Set Theory (New York: Academic Press, 1977).
END%%
%%ANKI
Basic
What is an equivalence relation on A
?
Back: A binary relation on A
that is reflexive on A
, symmetric, and transitive.
Reference: Herbert B. Enderton, Elements of Set Theory (New York: Academic Press, 1977).
END%%
%%ANKI
Cloze
An equivalence relation on A
is a {2
}-ary relation on A
.
Reference: Herbert B. Enderton, Elements of Set Theory (New York: Academic Press, 1977).
END%%
%%ANKI
Basic
Given R = \{\langle a, a \rangle\}
, is R
an equivalence relation?
Back: N/A. The question must provide a reference set.
Reference: Herbert B. Enderton, Elements of Set Theory (New York: Academic Press, 1977).
END%%
%%ANKI
Basic
Given R = \{\langle a, a \rangle\}
, is R
an equivalence relation on \{a\}
?
Back: Yes.
Reference: Herbert B. Enderton, Elements of Set Theory (New York: Academic Press, 1977).
END%%
%%ANKI
Basic
Given R = \{\langle a, a \rangle, \langle b, c \rangle\}
, is R
an equivalence relation on \{a\}
?
Back: No.
Reference: Herbert B. Enderton, Elements of Set Theory (New York: Academic Press, 1977).
END%%
%%ANKI
Basic
Why isn't R = \{\langle a, a \rangle, \langle b, c \rangle\}
an equivalence relation on \{a\}
?
Back: R
is neither symmetric nor transitive.
Reference: Herbert B. Enderton, Elements of Set Theory (New York: Academic Press, 1977).
END%%
%%ANKI Basic Which of symmetric relations and transitive relations is more general? Back: N/A. Reference: Herbert B. Enderton, Elements of Set Theory (New York: Academic Press, 1977).
END%%
%%ANKI
Basic
Which of equivalence relations on A
and symmetric relations is more general?
Back: Symmetric relations.
Reference: Herbert B. Enderton, Elements of Set Theory (New York: Academic Press, 1977).
END%%
%%ANKI
Basic
Which of binary relations on A
and equivalence relations on A
is more general?
Back: Binary relations on A
.
Reference: Herbert B. Enderton, Elements of Set Theory (New York: Academic Press, 1977).
END%%
The set [x]_R
is defined by [x]_R = \{t \mid xRt\}
. If R
is an equivalence relation and x \in \mathop{\text{fld}}R
, then [x]_R
is called the equivalence class of x
(modulo R
). If the relation R
is fixed by the context, we may write just [x]
.
%%ANKI
Basic
How is set [x]_R
defined?
Back: As \{t \mid xRt\}
.
Reference: Herbert B. Enderton, Elements of Set Theory (New York: Academic Press, 1977).
END%%
%%ANKI Basic What is an equivalence class? Back: A set of members mutually related w.r.t an equivalence relation. Reference: Herbert B. Enderton, Elements of Set Theory (New York: Academic Press, 1977).
END%%
%%ANKI
Basic
What kind of mathematical object is x
in [x]_R
?
Back: A set (or urelement).
Reference: Herbert B. Enderton, Elements of Set Theory (New York: Academic Press, 1977).
END%%
%%ANKI
Basic
What kind of mathematical object is R
in [x]_R
?
Back: A relation.
Reference: Herbert B. Enderton, Elements of Set Theory (New York: Academic Press, 1977).
END%%
%%ANKI
Basic
What compact notation is used to denote \{t \mid xRt\}
?
Back: [x]_R
Reference: Herbert B. Enderton, Elements of Set Theory (New York: Academic Press, 1977).
END%%
%%ANKI
Cloze
If {1:R
is an equivalence relation} and {1:x \in \mathop{\text{fld} }R
}, then [x]_R
is called the {2:equivalence class of x
} (modulo {2:R
}).
Reference: Herbert B. Enderton, Elements of Set Theory (New York: Academic Press, 1977).
END%%
%%ANKI
Basic
Consider an equivalence class of x
(modulo R
). What kind of mathematical object is x
?
Back: A set (or urelement).
Reference: Herbert B. Enderton, Elements of Set Theory (New York: Academic Press, 1977).
END%%
%%ANKI
Basic
Consider an equivalence class of x
(modulo R
). What kind of mathematical object is R
?
Back: A relation.
Reference: Herbert B. Enderton, Elements of Set Theory (New York: Academic Press, 1977).
END%%
%%ANKI
Basic
Consider an equivalence class of x
(modulo R
). What condition does x
necessarily satisfy?
Back: x \in \mathop{\text{fld}}R
Reference: Herbert B. Enderton, Elements of Set Theory (New York: Academic Press, 1977).
END%%
%%ANKI
Basic
Consider an equivalence class of x
(modulo R
). What condition does R
necessarily satisfy?
Back: R
is an equivalence relation.
Reference: Herbert B. Enderton, Elements of Set Theory (New York: Academic Press, 1977).
END%%
%%ANKI
Cloze
Assume R
is an equivalence relation on A
and that x, y \in A
. Then {1:[x]_R
} =
{1:[y]_R
} iff {2:xRy
}.
Reference: Herbert B. Enderton, Elements of Set Theory (New York: Academic Press, 1977).
END%%
Partitions
A partition \Pi
of a set A
is a set of nonempty subsets of A
that is disjoint and exhaustive.
%%ANKI Basic What kind of mathematical object is a partition of a set? Back: A set. Reference: Herbert B. Enderton, Elements of Set Theory (New York: Academic Press, 1977).
END%%
%%ANKI
Basic
What is a partition of a set A
?
Back: A set of nonempty subsets of A
that is disjoint and exhaustive.
Reference: Herbert B. Enderton, Elements of Set Theory (New York: Academic Press, 1977).
END%%
%%ANKI
Basic
Let \Pi
be a partition of a set A
. When does \Pi = \varnothing
?
Back: If and only if A = \varnothing
.
Reference: Herbert B. Enderton, Elements of Set Theory (New York: Academic Press, 1977).
END%%
%%ANKI
Basic
Let \Pi
be a partition of set A
. What property must each individual member of \Pi
exhibit?
Back: Each member is nonempty.
Reference: Herbert B. Enderton, Elements of Set Theory (New York: Academic Press, 1977).
END%%
%%ANKI
Basic
Let \Pi
be a partition of set A
. What property must each pair of members of \Pi
exhibit?
Back: Each pair must be disjoint.
Reference: Herbert B. Enderton, Elements of Set Theory (New York: Academic Press, 1977).
END%%
%%ANKI
Basic
Let \Pi
be a partition of set A
. Which property do all the members of \Pi
exhibit together?
Back: The members of \Pi
must be exhaustive.
Reference: Herbert B. Enderton, Elements of Set Theory (New York: Academic Press, 1977).
END%%
%%ANKI
Basic
What does it mean for a partition \Pi
of A
to be exhaustive?
Back: Every member of A
must appear in one of the members of \Pi
.
Reference: Herbert B. Enderton, Elements of Set Theory (New York: Academic Press, 1977).
END%%
%%ANKI
Basic
Is A
a partition of set A
?
Back: No.
Reference: Herbert B. Enderton, Elements of Set Theory (New York: Academic Press, 1977).
END%%
%%ANKI
Basic
Is \{A\}
a partition of set A
?
Back: Yes.
Reference: Herbert B. Enderton, Elements of Set Theory (New York: Academic Press, 1977).
END%%
%%ANKI
Basic
Let A = \{1, 2, 3, 4\}
. Why isn't \{\{1, 2\}, \{2, 3, 4\}\}
a partition of A
?
Back: Each pair of members of a partition of A
must be disjoint.
Reference: Herbert B. Enderton, Elements of Set Theory (New York: Academic Press, 1977).
END%%
%%ANKI
Basic
Let A = \{1, 2, 3, 4\}
. Why isn't \{\{1\}, \{2\}, \{3\}\}
a partition of A
?
Back: The members of a partition of A
must be exhaustive.
Reference: Herbert B. Enderton, Elements of Set Theory (New York: Academic Press, 1977).
END%%
%%ANKI
Basic
Let A = \{1, 2, 3, 4\}
. Why isn't \{\{1, 2, 3\}, \{4\}\}
a partition of A
?
Back: N/A. It is.
Reference: Herbert B. Enderton, Elements of Set Theory (New York: Academic Press, 1977).
END%%
Assume \Pi
is a partition of set A
. Then the relation R
is an equivalence relation: $xRy \Leftrightarrow (\exists B \in \Pi, x \in B \land y \in B)
$
%%ANKI
Basic
Let \Pi
be a partition of A
. What equivalence relation R
is induced?
Back: R
such that xRy \Leftrightarrow (\exists B \in \Pi, x \in B \land y \in B)
Reference: Herbert B. Enderton, Elements of Set Theory (New York: Academic Press, 1977).
END%%
Quotient Sets
If R
is an equivalence relation on A
, then the quotient set "A
modulo R
" is defined as $A / R = \{[x]_R \mid x \in A\}.
$
The natural map (or canonical map) \phi : A \rightarrow A / R
is given by \phi(x) = [x]_R.
Note that A / R
, the set of all equivalence classes, is a partition of A
.
%%ANKI
Basic
Let R
be an equivalence relation on A
. What partition is induced?
Back: A / R = \{[x]_R \mid x \in A\}
Reference: Herbert B. Enderton, Elements of Set Theory (New York: Academic Press, 1977).
END%%
%%ANKI
Basic
Members of A / R
are called what?
Back: Equivalence classes.
Reference: Herbert B. Enderton, Elements of Set Theory (New York: Academic Press, 1977).
END%%
%%ANKI
Basic
A / R
is a partition of what set?
Back: A
Reference: Herbert B. Enderton, Elements of Set Theory (New York: Academic Press, 1977).
END%%
%%ANKI
Basic
How is quotient set A / R
pronounced?
Back: As "A
modulo R
".
Reference: Herbert B. Enderton, Elements of Set Theory (New York: Academic Press, 1977).
END%%
%%ANKI
Basic
Consider quotient set A / R
. What kind of mathematical object is A
?
Back: A set.
Reference: Herbert B. Enderton, Elements of Set Theory (New York: Academic Press, 1977).
END%%
%%ANKI
Basic
Consider quotient set A / R
. What kind of mathematical object is R
?
Back: An equivalence relation on A
.
Reference: Herbert B. Enderton, Elements of Set Theory (New York: Academic Press, 1977).
END%%
%%ANKI
Basic
How is quotient set A / R
defined?
Back: As set \{[x]_R \mid x \in A\}
.
Reference: Herbert B. Enderton, Elements of Set Theory (New York: Academic Press, 1977).
END%%
%%ANKI
Basic
Given quotient set A / R
, what is the domain of its natural map?
Back: A
.
Reference: Herbert B. Enderton, Elements of Set Theory (New York: Academic Press, 1977).
END%%
%%ANKI
Basic
Given quotient set A / R
, what is the codomain of its natural map?
Back: A / R
.
Reference: Herbert B. Enderton, Elements of Set Theory (New York: Academic Press, 1977).
END%%
%%ANKI
Basic
Consider quotient set A / R
. How is the natural map \phi
defined?
Back: \phi \colon A \rightarrow A / R
given by \phi(x) = [x]_R
.
Reference: Herbert B. Enderton, Elements of Set Theory (New York: Academic Press, 1977).
END%%
%%ANKI
Basic
Given quotient set A / R
, what is the domain of its canonical map?
Back: A
.
Reference: Herbert B. Enderton, Elements of Set Theory (New York: Academic Press, 1977).
END%%
%%ANKI
Basic
Given quotient set A / R
, what is the codomain of its canonical map?
Back: A / R
.
Reference: Herbert B. Enderton, Elements of Set Theory (New York: Academic Press, 1977).
END%%
%%ANKI
Basic
Consider quotient set A / R
. How is the canonical map \phi
defined?
Back: \phi \colon A \rightarrow A / R
given by \phi(x) = [x]_R
.
Reference: Herbert B. Enderton, Elements of Set Theory (New York: Academic Press, 1977).
END%%
%%ANKI
Basic
Consider set \omega
and equivalence relation \sim
. How is the relevant quotient set denoted?
Back: As \omega / {\sim}
.
Reference: Herbert B. Enderton, Elements of Set Theory (New York: Academic Press, 1977).
END%%
%%ANKI
Cloze
Let R
be an equivalence relation on A
and x \in A
. Then {1:x
(modulo R
)} is an {2:equivalence class} whereas {2:A
modulo R
} is a {1:quotient set}.
Reference: Herbert B. Enderton, Elements of Set Theory (New York: Academic Press, 1977).
END%%
Bibliography
- “Cartesian Product,” in Wikipedia, April 17, 2024, https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Cartesian_product&oldid=1219343305.
- Herbert B. Enderton, Elements of Set Theory (New York: Academic Press, 1977).