4.3 KiB
| title | TARGET DECK | FILE TAGS | tags | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Permissivism | Obsidian::H&SS | ontology::permissivism |
|
Overview
Roughly speaking, permissivism refers to the stance that everything that can be described without (at least obvious) contradiction exists. Generally speaking, permissivists tend to think the question of whether or not things exist is trivial to answer.
%%ANKI Basic What is permissivism? Back: The view that everything describable (without obvious) contradiction exists. Reference: Simon Hewitt, “A Cardinal Worry for Permissive Metaontology,” Metaphysica 16, no. 2 (September 18, 2015): 159–65, https://doi.org/10.1515/mp-2015-0009.
END%%
%%ANKI Basic What metaontological view proposes answering customary existence questions in the affirmative? Back: Permissivism. Reference: Simon Hewitt, “A Cardinal Worry for Permissive Metaontology,” Metaphysica 16, no. 2 (September 18, 2015): 159–65, https://doi.org/10.1515/mp-2015-0009.
END%%
%%ANKI Basic What triviality is usually associated with permissivists? Back: Permissivists tend to think most existence questions admit purely trivial answers. Reference: Simon Hewitt, “A Cardinal Worry for Permissive Metaontology,” Metaphysica 16, no. 2 (September 18, 2015): 159–65, https://doi.org/10.1515/mp-2015-0009.
END%%
%%ANKI
Basic
In permissivism, what is the antecedent to consequent "X exists"?
Back: "X can be described without contradiction."
Reference: Simon Hewitt, “A Cardinal Worry for Permissive Metaontology,” Metaphysica 16, no. 2 (September 18, 2015): 159–65, https://doi.org/10.1515/mp-2015-0009.
END%%
%%ANKI
Basic
In permissivism, what is the consequent to antecedent "X can be described without contradiction"?
Back: "X exists."
Reference: Simon Hewitt, “A Cardinal Worry for Permissive Metaontology,” Metaphysica 16, no. 2 (September 18, 2015): 159–65, https://doi.org/10.1515/mp-2015-0009.
END%%
%%ANKI Basic How would a permissivist answer the question, "What is there?" Back: "Everything describable without contradiction." Reference: Nikk Effingham, An Introduction to Ontology (Cambridge: Polity Press, 2013).
END%%
%%ANKI
Basic
How is English statement "There is an X" interpreted by a permissivist?
Back: As "X exists".
Reference: Nikk Effingham, An Introduction to Ontology (Cambridge: Polity Press, 2013).
END%%
%%ANKI Basic Can a permissivist commit to the existence of square circles? Back: Yes. Reference: Nikk Effingham, An Introduction to Ontology (Cambridge: Polity Press, 2013).
END%%
%%ANKI Basic Need a permissivist commit to the existence of square circles? Back: No. Reference: Nikk Effingham, An Introduction to Ontology (Cambridge: Polity Press, 2013).
END%%
%%ANKI Basic What general strategy is used as an argument against permissivism? Back: Individually acceptable committments lead to contradictions when accepted jointly. Reference: Nikk Effingham, An Introduction to Ontology (Cambridge: Polity Press, 2013).
END%%
%%ANKI Basic What Russell-like paradox is typically used to argue against permissivism? Back: The paradox of non-self-instantiation. Reference: Nikk Effingham, An Introduction to Ontology (Cambridge: Polity Press, 2013).
END%%
Bibliography
- Francesco Orilia and Michele Paolini Paoletti, “Properties,” in The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, ed. Edward N. Zalta, Spring 2022 (Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University, 2022), https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2022/entries/properties/.
- Nikk Effingham, An Introduction to Ontology (Cambridge: Polity Press, 2013).
- Simon Hewitt, “A Cardinal Worry for Permissive Metaontology,” Metaphysica 16, no. 2 (September 18, 2015): 159–65, https://doi.org/10.1515/mp-2015-0009.