32 KiB
| title | TARGET DECK | FILE TAGS | tags | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Predicate Transformers | Obsidian::STEM | programming::pred-trans |
|
Overview
Define \{Q\}\; S\; \{R\} as the predicate:
If execution of
Sis begun in a state satisfyingQ, then it is guaranteed to terminate in a finite amount of time in a state satisfyingR.
%%ANKI
Basic
What is Q in predicate \{Q\}\; S\; \{R\}?
Back: A predicate.
Reference: Gries, David. The Science of Programming. Texts and Monographs in Computer Science. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1981.
END%%
%%ANKI
Basic
What name is given to Q in \{Q\}\; S\; \{R\}?
Back: The precondition of S.
Reference: Gries, David. The Science of Programming. Texts and Monographs in Computer Science. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1981.
END%%
%%ANKI
Basic
What is R in predicate \{Q\}\; S\; \{R\}?
Back: A predicate.
Reference: Gries, David. The Science of Programming. Texts and Monographs in Computer Science. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1981.
END%%
%%ANKI
Basic
What name is given to R in \{Q\}\; S\; \{R\}?
Back: The postcondition of S.
Reference: Gries, David. The Science of Programming. Texts and Monographs in Computer Science. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1981.
END%%
%%ANKI
Basic
What is S in predicate \{Q\}\; S\; \{R\}?
Back: A program (a sequence of statements).
Reference: Gries, David. The Science of Programming. Texts and Monographs in Computer Science. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1981.
END%%
%%ANKI
Basic
Interpret \{Q\}\; S\; \{R\} in English. What is the antecedent of the implication?
Back: S is executed in a state satisfying Q.
Reference: Gries, David. The Science of Programming. Texts and Monographs in Computer Science. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1981.
END%%
%%ANKI
Basic
Interpret \{Q\}\; S\; \{R\} in English. What is the consequent of the implication?
Back: S terminates in a finite amount of time in a state satisfying R.
Reference: Gries, David. The Science of Programming. Texts and Monographs in Computer Science. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1981.
END%%
%%ANKI
Basic
How is \{Q\}\; S\; \{R\} defined?
Back: If S is executed in a state satisfying Q, it eventually terminates in a state satisfying R.
Reference: Gries, David. The Science of Programming. Texts and Monographs in Computer Science. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1981.
END%%
%%ANKI
Basic
How is \{x = X \land y = Y\}\; swap\; \{x = Y \land y = X\} rewritten without free identifiers?
Back: \forall x, y, X, Y, \{x = X \land y = Y\}\; swap\; \{x = Y \land y = X\}
Reference: Gries, David. The Science of Programming. Texts and Monographs in Computer Science. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1981.
END%%
%%ANKI
Basic
What name is given to X in e.g. \{x = X\}\; S\; \{y = Y\}?
Back: The initial value of x.
Reference: Gries, David. The Science of Programming. Texts and Monographs in Computer Science. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1981.
END%%
%%ANKI
Basic
How is \{Q\}\; S\; \{R\} augmented so that x has initial value X?
Back: \{Q \land x = X\}\; S\; \{R\}
Reference: Gries, David. The Science of Programming. Texts and Monographs in Computer Science. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1981.
END%%
%%ANKI
Basic
What name is given to Y in e.g. \{x = X\}\; S\; \{y = Y\}?
Back: The final value of y.
Reference: Gries, David. The Science of Programming. Texts and Monographs in Computer Science. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1981.
END%%
%%ANKI
Basic
How is \{Q\}\; S\; \{R\} augmented so that y has final value X?
Back: \{Q\}\; S\; \{R \land y = X\}
Reference: Gries, David. The Science of Programming. Texts and Monographs in Computer Science. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1981.
END%%
%%ANKI
Basic
How is \{Q\}\; S\; \{R\} augmented so that y has initial value X?
Back: \{Q \land y = X\}\; S\; \{R\}
Reference: Gries, David. The Science of Programming. Texts and Monographs in Computer Science. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1981.
END%%
%%ANKI
Basic
Why is \{T\}\; \text{while }T\text{ do skip}\; \{T\} everywhere false?
Back: Because "\text{while }T\text{ do skip}" never terminates.
Reference: Gries, David. The Science of Programming. Texts and Monographs in Computer Science. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1981.
END%%
Weakest Precondition
For any command S and predicate R, we define the weakest precondition of S with respect to R, denoted wp(S, R), as
the set of all states such that execution of
Sbegun in any one of them is guaranteed to terminate in a finite amount of time in a state satisfyingR.
Expression \{Q\}\; S\; \{R\} is equivalent to Q \Rightarrow wp(S, R).
%%ANKI
Basic
What is the predicate transformer wp an acronym for?
Back: The weakest precondition.
Reference: Reference: Gries, David. The Science of Programming. Texts and Monographs in Computer Science. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1981.
END%%
%%ANKI
Basic
Given command S and predicate R, how is wp(S, R) defined?
Back: As the set of all states such that execution of S in any one of them eventually terminates in a state satisfying R.
Reference: Reference: Gries, David. The Science of Programming. Texts and Monographs in Computer Science. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1981.
END%%
%%ANKI Basic In terms of implications, how does a precondition compare to the weakest precondition? Back: A precondition implies the weakest precondition but not the other way around. Reference: Reference: Gries, David. The Science of Programming. Texts and Monographs in Computer Science. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1981.
END%%
%%ANKI Basic In terms of sets of states, how does a precondition compare to the weakest precondition? Back: A precondition represents a subset of the states the weakest precondition represents. Reference: Reference: Gries, David. The Science of Programming. Texts and Monographs in Computer Science. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1981.
END%%
%%ANKI
Basic
How is \{Q\}\; S\; \{R\} equivalently written as a predicate involving wp?
Back: Q \Rightarrow wp(S, R)
Reference: Reference: Gries, David. The Science of Programming. Texts and Monographs in Computer Science. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1981.
END%%
%%ANKI
Basic
How is Q \Rightarrow wp(S, R) equivalently written as a predicate using assertions?
Back: \{Q\}\; S\; \{R\}
Reference: Reference: Gries, David. The Science of Programming. Texts and Monographs in Computer Science. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1981.
END%%
%%ANKI
Basic
What kind of mathematical object is the wp transformer?
Back: A function.
Reference: Reference: Gries, David. The Science of Programming. Texts and Monographs in Computer Science. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1981.
END%%
%%ANKI
Basic
Given command S and predicate R, what kind of mathematical object is wp(S, R)?
Back: A predicate, i.e. a set of states.
Reference: Reference: Gries, David. The Science of Programming. Texts and Monographs in Computer Science. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1981.
END%%
%%ANKI Basic What does the term "predicate transformer" refer to? Back: A function that transforms one predicate into another. Reference: Reference: Gries, David. The Science of Programming. Texts and Monographs in Computer Science. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1981.
END%%
%%ANKI
Basic
What does the following evaluate to? $wp(''\text{if } x \geq y \text{ then } z := x \text{ else } z := y'', z = y)$
Back: y \geq x
Reference: Reference: Gries, David. The Science of Programming. Texts and Monographs in Computer Science. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1981.
END%%
%%ANKI
Basic
What does the following evaluate to? $wp(''\text{if } x \geq y \text{ then } z := x \text{ else } z := y'', z = y - 1)$
Back: F
Reference: Reference: Gries, David. The Science of Programming. Texts and Monographs in Computer Science. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1981.
END%%
%%ANKI
Basic
What does the following evaluate to? $wp(''\text{if } x \geq y \text{ then } z := x \text{ else } z := y'', z = y + 1)$
Back: x = y + 1
Reference: Reference: Gries, David. The Science of Programming. Texts and Monographs in Computer Science. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1981.
END%%
%%ANKI
Basic
What does the following evaluate to? $wp(''\text{if } x \geq y \text{ then } z := x \text{ else } z := y'', z = max(x, y))$
Back: T
Reference: Reference: Gries, David. The Science of Programming. Texts and Monographs in Computer Science. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1981.
END%%
%%ANKI
Basic
Given command S, how is wp(S, T) interpreted?
Back: As the set of all states such that execution of S in any of them terminates in a finite amount of time.
Reference: Reference: Gries, David. The Science of Programming. Texts and Monographs in Computer Science. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1981.
END%%
Law of the Excluded Miracle
Given any command S, $wp(S, F) = F$
%%ANKI
Basic
Given command S, what does wp(S, F) evaluate to?
Back: F.
Reference: Reference: Gries, David. The Science of Programming. Texts and Monographs in Computer Science. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1981.
END%%
%%ANKI
Basic
What does the Law of the Excluded Miracle state?
Back: For any command S, wp(S, F) = F.
Reference: Reference: Gries, David. The Science of Programming. Texts and Monographs in Computer Science. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1981.
END%%
%%ANKI
Basic
What name is given to identity wp(S, F) = F?
Back: The Law of the Excluded Miracle.
Reference: Reference: Gries, David. The Science of Programming. Texts and Monographs in Computer Science. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1981.
END%%
%%ANKI
Basic
Explain why the Law of the Excluded Miracle holds true.
Back: No state satisfies F so no precondition can either.
Reference: Reference: Gries, David. The Science of Programming. Texts and Monographs in Computer Science. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1981.
END%%
%%ANKI Basic Why is the Law of the Excluded Miracle named the way it is? Back: It would indeed be a miracle if execution could terminate in no state. Reference: Reference: Gries, David. The Science of Programming. Texts and Monographs in Computer Science. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1981.
END%%
%%ANKI Basic In Gries's exposition, is the Law of the Excluded Miracle taken as an axiom or a theorem? Back: An axiom. Reference: Reference: Gries, David. The Science of Programming. Texts and Monographs in Computer Science. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1981.
END%%
Distributivity of Conjunction
Given command S and predicates Q and R, $wp(S, Q \land R) = wp(S, Q) \land wp(S, R)$
%%ANKI
Basic
What does Distributivity of Conjunction state?
Back: Given command S and predicates Q and R, wp(S, Q \land R) = wp(S, Q) \land wp(S, R).
Reference: Gries, David. The Science of Programming. Texts and Monographs in Computer Science. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1981.
END%%
%%ANKI
Cloze
Distributivity of Conjunction states {wp(S, Q \land R)} = {wp(S, Q) \land wp(S, R)}.
Reference: Gries, David. The Science of Programming. Texts and Monographs in Computer Science. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1981.
END%%
%%ANKI Basic In Gries's exposition, is Distributivity of Conjunction taken as an axiom or a theorem? Back: An axiom. Reference: Gries, David. The Science of Programming. Texts and Monographs in Computer Science. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1981.
END%%
%%ANKI
Basic
Is wp(S, Q) \land wp(S, R) \Rightarrow wp(S, Q \land R) true if S is nondeterministic?
Back: Yes.
Reference: Gries, David. The Science of Programming. Texts and Monographs in Computer Science. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1981.
END%%
%%ANKI
Basic
Is wp(S, Q \land R) \Rightarrow wp(S, Q) \land wp(S, R) true if S is nondeterministic?
Back: Yes.
Reference: Gries, David. The Science of Programming. Texts and Monographs in Computer Science. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1981.
END%%
Law of Monotonicity
Given command S and predicates Q and R, if Q \Rightarrow R, then wp(S, Q) \Rightarrow wp(S, R).
%%ANKI
What does the Law of Monotonicity state?
Back: Given command S and predicates Q and R, if Q \Rightarrow R, then wp(S, Q) \Rightarrow wp(S, R).
Reference: Reference: Gries, David. The Science of Programming. Texts and Monographs in Computer Science. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1981.
END%%
%%ANKI
Cloze
Given command S, the Law of Monotonicity states that if {1:Q} \Rightarrow {2:R}, then {2:wp(S, Q)} \Rightarrow {1:wp(S, R)}.
Reference: Reference: Gries, David. The Science of Programming. Texts and Monographs in Computer Science. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1981.
END%%
%%ANKI Basic In Gries's exposition, is the Law of Monotonicity taken as an axiom or a theorem? Back: A theorem. Reference: Reference: Gries, David. The Science of Programming. Texts and Monographs in Computer Science. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1981.
END%%
%%ANKI Basic Is the Law of Monotonicity true if the relevant command is nondeterministic? Back: Yes. Reference: Reference: Gries, David. The Science of Programming. Texts and Monographs in Computer Science. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1981.
END%%
Distributivity of Disjunction
Given command S and predicates Q and R, $wp(S, Q) \lor wp(S, R) \Rightarrow wp(S, Q \lor R)$
%%ANKI
Basic
What does Distributivity of Disjunction state?
Back: Given command S and predicates Q and R, wp(S, Q) \lor wp(S, R) \Rightarrow wp(S, Q \lor R).
Reference: Gries, David. The Science of Programming. Texts and Monographs in Computer Science. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1981.
END%%
%%ANKI
Cloze
Distributivity of Disjunction states {1:wp(S, Q) \lor wp(S, r)} \Rightarrow {1:wp(S, Q \lor R)}.
Reference: Gries, David. The Science of Programming. Texts and Monographs in Computer Science. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1981.
END%%
%%ANKI Basic In Gries's exposition, is Distributivity of Disjunction taken as an axiom or a theorem? Back: A theorem. Reference: Gries, David. The Science of Programming. Texts and Monographs in Computer Science. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1981.
END%%
%%ANKI
Basic
Assuming S is nondeterministic, is the following a tautology? $wp(S, Q \lor R) \Rightarrow wp(S, Q) \lor wp(S, R)$
Back: No.
Reference: Gries, David. The Science of Programming. Texts and Monographs in Computer Science. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1981.
END%%
%%ANKI
Basic
Assuming S is nondeterministic, is the following a tautology? $wp(S, Q) \lor wp(S, R) \Rightarrow wp(S, Q \lor R)$
Back: Yes.
Reference: Gries, David. The Science of Programming. Texts and Monographs in Computer Science. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1981.
END%%
%%ANKI
Basic
Assuming S is deterministic, is the following a tautology? $wp(S, Q \lor R) \Rightarrow wp(S, Q) \lor wp(S, R)$
Back: Yes.
Reference: Gries, David. The Science of Programming. Texts and Monographs in Computer Science. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1981.
END%%
%%ANKI
Basic
Assuming S is deterministic, is the following a tautology? $wp(S, Q) \lor wp(S, R) \Rightarrow wp(S, Q \lor R)$
Back: Yes.
Reference: Gries, David. The Science of Programming. Texts and Monographs in Computer Science. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1981.
END%%
%%ANKI Basic What command does Gries use to demonstrate nondeterminism? Back: The flipping of a coin. Reference: Gries, David. The Science of Programming. Texts and Monographs in Computer Science. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1981.
END%%
%%ANKI
Basic
What does it mean for command S to be nondeterministic?
Back: Execution may not be the same even if begun in the same state.
Reference: Gries, David. The Science of Programming. Texts and Monographs in Computer Science. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1981.
END%%
%%ANKI
Basic
Let S flip a coin and Q be flipping heads. What is wp(S, Q)?
Back: F
Reference: Gries, David. The Science of Programming. Texts and Monographs in Computer Science. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1981.
END%%
%%ANKI
Basic
Let S flip a coin and Q be flipping tails. What is wp(S, Q)?
Back: F
Reference: Gries, David. The Science of Programming. Texts and Monographs in Computer Science. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1981.
END%%
%%ANKI
Basic
Let S flip a coin, Q be flipping heads, and R be flipping tails. What is wp(S, Q \lor R)?
Back: T
Reference: Gries, David. The Science of Programming. Texts and Monographs in Computer Science. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1981.
END%%
%%ANKI Basic Why does Distributivity of Disjunction use an implication instead of equality? Back: Because the underlying command may be nondeterministic. Reference: Gries, David. The Science of Programming. Texts and Monographs in Computer Science. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1981.
END%%
%%ANKI Basic When does Distributivity of Disjunction hold under equality (instead of implication)? Back: When the underlying command is deterministic. Reference: Gries, David. The Science of Programming. Texts and Monographs in Computer Science. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1981.
END%%
Commands
Skip
For any predicate R, wp(skip, R) = R.
%%ANKI
Basic
How is the skip command defined in terms of wp?
Back: For any predicate R, wp(skip, R) = R.
Reference: Gries, David. The Science of Programming. Texts and Monographs in Computer Science. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1981.
END%%
%%ANKI
Basic
Which command does Gries call the "identity transformation"?
Back: skip
Reference: Gries, David. The Science of Programming. Texts and Monographs in Computer Science. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1981.
END%%
%%ANKI
Cloze
Provide the specific command: for any predicate R, wp({skip}, R) = R.
Reference: Gries, David. The Science of Programming. Texts and Monographs in Computer Science. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1981.
END%%
Abort
For any predicate R, wp(abort, R) = F.
%%ANKI
Basic
How is the abort command defined in terms of wp?
Back: For any predicate R, wp(abort, R) = F.
Reference: Gries, David. The Science of Programming. Texts and Monographs in Computer Science. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1981.
END%%
%%ANKI
Cloze
Provide the specific command: for any predicate R, wp({abort}, R) = F.
Reference: Gries, David. The Science of Programming. Texts and Monographs in Computer Science. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1981.
END%%
%%ANKI
Basic
How is the abort command executed?
Back: It isn't.
Reference: Gries, David. The Science of Programming. Texts and Monographs in Computer Science. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1981.
END%%
%%ANKI
Basic
Why can't the abort command be executed?
Back: By definition it executes in state F which is impossible.
Reference: Gries, David. The Science of Programming. Texts and Monographs in Computer Science. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1981.
END%%
%%ANKI
Basic
Which command does Gries introduce as the only "constant" predicate transformer?
Back: abort
Reference: Gries, David. The Science of Programming. Texts and Monographs in Computer Science. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1981.
END%%
%%ANKI
Basic
How do we prove that abort is the only "constant" predicate transformer?
Back: For any command S, the Law of the Excluded Miracle proves wp(S, F) = F.
Reference: Gries, David. The Science of Programming. Texts and Monographs in Computer Science. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1981.
END%%
%%ANKI
Basic
Suppose makeTrue is defined as wp(makeTrue, R) = T for all predicates R. What's wrong?
Back: If R = F, makeTrue violates the Law of the Excluded Miracle.
Reference: Gries, David. The Science of Programming. Texts and Monographs in Computer Science. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1981.
END%%
Sequential Composition
Sequential composition is one way of composing larger program segments from smaller segments. Let S1 and S2 be two commands. Then S1; S2 is defined as $wp(''S1; S2'', R) = wp(S1, wp(S2, R))$
%%ANKI
Basic
Let S1 and S2 be two commands. How is their sequential composition denoted?
Back: S1; S2
Reference: Gries, David. The Science of Programming. Texts and Monographs in Computer Science. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1981.
END%%
%%ANKI
Basic
How is S1; S2 defined in terms of wp?
Back: For any predicate R, wp(''S1; S2'', R) = wp(S1, wp(S2, R)).
Reference: Gries, David. The Science of Programming. Texts and Monographs in Computer Science. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1981.
END%%
%%ANKI Basic Is sequential composition commutative? Back: No. Reference: Gries, David. The Science of Programming. Texts and Monographs in Computer Science. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1981.
END%%
%%ANKI Basic Is sequential composition associative? Back: Yes. Reference: Gries, David. The Science of Programming. Texts and Monographs in Computer Science. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1981.
END%%
Assignment
%%ANKI Basic What equivalence transformation rule is assignment related to? Back: Substitution. Reference: Gries, David. The Science of Programming. Texts and Monographs in Computer Science. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1981.
END%%
Simple
The assignment command has form x \coloneqq e, provided the types of x and e are the same. This command is read as "x becomes e" and is defined as $wp(''x \coloneqq e'', R) = domain(e) \textbf{ cand } R_e^x$
where domain(e) is a predicate that describes the set of all states in which e may be evaluated.
%%ANKI
Basic
The assignment command has what form?
Back: x \coloneqq e
Reference: Gries, David. The Science of Programming. Texts and Monographs in Computer Science. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1981.
END%%
%%ANKI
Basic
How is assignment "x \coloneqq e" pronounced?
Back: As "x becomes e".
Reference: Gries, David. The Science of Programming. Texts and Monographs in Computer Science. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1981.
END%%
%%ANKI
Basic
How is assignment "x \coloneqq e" defined in terms of wp?
Back: wp(''x \coloneqq e'', R) = domain(e) \textbf{ cand } R_e^x
Reference: Gries, David. The Science of Programming. Texts and Monographs in Computer Science. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1981.
END%%
%%ANKI
Basic
In the wp definition of "x \coloneqq e", what does domain(e) refer to?
Back: A predicate that holds if e is well-defined.
Reference: Gries, David. The Science of Programming. Texts and Monographs in Computer Science. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1981.
END%%
%%ANKI
Basic
In the wp definition of "x \coloneqq e", domain(e) must exclude which states?
Back: Those in which evaluation of e would be undefined.
Reference: Gries, David. The Science of Programming. Texts and Monographs in Computer Science. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1981.
END%%
%%ANKI
Basic
What assumption is made when defining assignment as "wp(''x \coloneqq e'', R) = R_e^x"?
Back: domain(e), i.e. evaluation of e is well-defined.
Reference: Gries, David. The Science of Programming. Texts and Monographs in Computer Science. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1981.
END%%
%%ANKI
Basic
How is definition "wp(''x \coloneqq e'', R) = R_e^x" more completely stated?
Back: wp(''x \coloneqq e'', R) = domain(e) \textbf{ cand } R_e^x
Reference: Gries, David. The Science of Programming. Texts and Monographs in Computer Science. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1981.
END%%
%%ANKI
Basic
In what way is the wp definition of assignment usually simplified?
Back: It is assumed evaluation of expressions (i.e. the RHS of \coloneqq) are always well-defined.
Reference: Gries, David. The Science of Programming. Texts and Monographs in Computer Science. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1981.
END%%
%%ANKI
Basic
What does Gries state is "bewildering at first" about definition "wp(''x \coloneqq e'', R) = R_e^x"?
Back: Operational habits make us feel the precondition should be R and postcondition R_e^x.
Reference: Gries, David. The Science of Programming. Texts and Monographs in Computer Science. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1981.
END%%
%%ANKI
Basic
How is definition wp(''x \coloneqq e'', R) = R_e^x informally justified?
Back: Since x becomes e, R is true after execution iff R_e^x is true before execution.
Reference: Gries, David. The Science of Programming. Texts and Monographs in Computer Science. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1981.
END%%
%%ANKI
Basic
What does wp(''x \coloneqq 5'', x = 5) evaluate to?
Back: T
Reference: Gries, David. The Science of Programming. Texts and Monographs in Computer Science. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1981.
END%%
%%ANKI
Basic
What does wp(''x \coloneqq 5'', x \neq 5) evaluate to?
Back: F
Reference: Gries, David. The Science of Programming. Texts and Monographs in Computer Science. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1981.
END%%
%%ANKI
Basic
What does wp(''x \coloneqq x + 1'', x < 0) evaluate to?
Back: x < -1
Reference: Gries, David. The Science of Programming. Texts and Monographs in Computer Science. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1981.
END%%
%%ANKI
Basic
Given array b with subscript range 0{:}100, what does wp(''x \coloneqq b[i]'', x = b[i]) evaluate to?
Back: 0 \leq i \leq 100
Reference: Gries, David. The Science of Programming. Texts and Monographs in Computer Science. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1981.
END%%
%%ANKI
Basic
Assume c is constant and x, y are distinct. What does wp(''x \coloneqq e'', y = c) evaluate to?
Back: y = c
Reference: Gries, David. The Science of Programming. Texts and Monographs in Computer Science. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1981.
END%%
%%ANKI
Basic
What does evaluation "wp(''x \coloneqq e'', y = c) = (y = c)" demonstrate?
Back: That assignment (and expression evaluation) should exhibit no side effects.
Reference: Gries, David. The Science of Programming. Texts and Monographs in Computer Science. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1981.
END%%
General
The multiple assignment command has form $x_1 \circ s_1, \cdots, x_n \circ s_n \coloneqq e_1, \cdots, e_n$
where each x_i is an identifier, each s_i is a equiv-trans#Selectors, and each expression e_i has the same type as x_i \circ s_i. We denote this assignment more compactly as \bar{x} \coloneqq \bar{e}. We define multiple assignment as $wp(''\bar{x} \coloneqq \bar{e}'', R) = domain(\bar{e}) \textbf{ cand } R_{\bar{e}}^\bar{x}$
%%ANKI
Basic
How is x \coloneqq e expressed in more general form x_1 \circ s_1, \ldots, x_n \circ s_n \coloneqq e_1, \ldots, e_n?
Back: As x \circ \epsilon \coloneqq e.
Reference: Gries, David. The Science of Programming. Texts and Monographs in Computer Science. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1981.
END%%
%%ANKI
Basic
How is b[i] \coloneqq e expressed in more general form x_1 \circ s_1, \ldots, x_n \circ s_n \coloneqq e_1, \ldots, e_n?
Back: As b \circ [i] \coloneqq e.
Reference: Gries, David. The Science of Programming. Texts and Monographs in Computer Science. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1981.
END%%
%%ANKI
Basic
Consider assignment command \bar{x} \coloneqq \bar{e}. In what order must \bar{e} be evaluated?
Back: In any order.
Reference: Gries, David. The Science of Programming. Texts and Monographs in Computer Science. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1981.
END%%
%%ANKI
Basic
Consider assignment command \bar{x} \coloneqq \bar{e}. In what order must assignment be performed?
Back: Left-to-right.
Reference: Gries, David. The Science of Programming. Texts and Monographs in Computer Science. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1981.
END%%
%%ANKI
Basic
Why must assignment in \bar{x} \coloneqq \bar{e} happen left-to-right?
Back: Because update selector syntax has right-to-left precedence.
Reference: Gries, David. The Science of Programming. Texts and Monographs in Computer Science. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1981.
END%%
%%ANKI
Basic
Consider assignment command \bar{x} \coloneqq \bar{e}. When can assignment be performed in any order?
Back: When the identifiers in \bar{x} are distinct.
Reference: Gries, David. The Science of Programming. Texts and Monographs in Computer Science. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1981.
END%%
%%ANKI
Basic
The general assignment command has what form?
Back: \bar{x} \coloneqq \bar{e}
Reference: Gries, David. The Science of Programming. Texts and Monographs in Computer Science. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1981.
END%%
%%ANKI
Basic
How is assignment "\bar{x} \coloneqq \bar{e}" defined in terms of wp?
Back: wp(''\bar{x} \coloneqq \bar{e}'', R) = domain(\bar{e}) \textbf{ cand } R_{\bar{e}}^{\bar{x}}
Reference: Gries, David. The Science of Programming. Texts and Monographs in Computer Science. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1981.
END%%
%%ANKI
Basic
In the wp definition of "\bar{x} \coloneqq \bar{e}", what does domain(\bar{e}) refer to?
Back: A predicate that holds if each member of \bar{e} is well-defined.
Reference: Gries, David. The Science of Programming. Texts and Monographs in Computer Science. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1981.
END%%
%%ANKI
Basic
In the wp definition of "\bar{x} \coloneqq \bar{e}", domain(\bar{e}) must exclude which states?
Back: Those in which evaluation of any member of \bar{e} would be undefined.
Reference: Gries, David. The Science of Programming. Texts and Monographs in Computer Science. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1981.
END%%
%%ANKI
Basic
What assumption is made when defining assignment as "wp(''\bar{x} \coloneqq \bar{e}'', R) = R_{\bar{e}}^{\bar{x}}"?
Back: domain(\bar{e}), i.e. evaluation of each member of \bar{e} is well-defined.
Reference: Gries, David. The Science of Programming. Texts and Monographs in Computer Science. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1981.
END%%
%%ANKI
Basic
How is definition "wp(''\bar{x} \coloneqq \bar{e}'', R) = R_{\bar{e}}^{\bar{x}}" more completely stated?
Back: wp(''\bar{x} \coloneqq \bar{e}'', R) = domain(\bar{e}) \textbf{ cand } R_{\bar{e}}^{\bar{x}}
Reference: Gries, David. The Science of Programming. Texts and Monographs in Computer Science. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1981.
END%%
%%ANKI
Basic
Given \bar{e} = \langle e_1, \ldots, e_n \rangle, how is \mathop{domain}(\bar{e}) defined in predicate logic?
Back: \forall i, 1 \leq i \leq n \Rightarrow \mathop{domain}(e_i)
Reference: Gries, David. The Science of Programming. Texts and Monographs in Computer Science. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1981.
END%%
Bibliography
- Gries, David. The Science of Programming. Texts and Monographs in Computer Science. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1981.