116 lines
3.6 KiB
Markdown
116 lines
3.6 KiB
Markdown
---
|
||
title: Ontology
|
||
TARGET DECK: Obsidian::H&SS
|
||
FILE TAGS: ontology
|
||
tags:
|
||
- ontology
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## Overview
|
||
|
||
Ontology is the philosophical study of being. Generally *things* are split into two broad categories: **abstract** and **concrete** things. These words are "terms of art" and their definition is not standardized in any way.
|
||
|
||
%%ANKI
|
||
Basic
|
||
What did Quine declare as *the* ontological question?
|
||
Back: "What is there?"
|
||
Reference: Simon Hewitt, “A Cardinal Worry for Permissive Metaontology,” _Metaphysica_ 16, no. 2 (September 18, 2015): 159–65, [https://doi.org/10.1515/mp-2015-0009](https://doi.org/10.1515/mp-2015-0009).
|
||
<!--ID: 1720912238054-->
|
||
END%%
|
||
|
||
%%ANKI
|
||
Basic
|
||
Who is attributed *the* ontological question?
|
||
Back: Quine.
|
||
Reference: Simon Hewitt, “A Cardinal Worry for Permissive Metaontology,” _Metaphysica_ 16, no. 2 (September 18, 2015): 159–65, [https://doi.org/10.1515/mp-2015-0009](https://doi.org/10.1515/mp-2015-0009).
|
||
<!--ID: 1720912259767-->
|
||
END%%
|
||
|
||
%%ANKI
|
||
Cloze
|
||
{Ontology} is the {philosophical study of being}.
|
||
Reference: Nikk Effingham, _An Introduction to Ontology_ (Cambridge: Polity Press, 2013).
|
||
<!--ID: 1720912238058-->
|
||
END%%
|
||
|
||
%%ANKI
|
||
Cloze
|
||
{Epistemology} is the {philosophical study of knowledge}.
|
||
Reference: Nikk Effingham, _An Introduction to Ontology_ (Cambridge: Polity Press, 2013).
|
||
<!--ID: 1720912238062-->
|
||
END%%
|
||
|
||
%%ANKI
|
||
Cloze
|
||
{Taxonomy} is the {branch of science concerned with categorization}.
|
||
Reference: Nikk Effingham, _An Introduction to Ontology_ (Cambridge: Polity Press, 2013).
|
||
<!--ID: 1720912238066-->
|
||
END%%
|
||
|
||
%%ANKI
|
||
Basic
|
||
What does Effingham mean when saying "concreta" and "abstracta" are terms of art?
|
||
Back: They are terms defined freely by a person to mean whatever one wants.
|
||
Reference: Nikk Effingham, _An Introduction to Ontology_ (Cambridge: Polity Press, 2013).
|
||
<!--ID: 1720894782942-->
|
||
END%%
|
||
|
||
%%ANKI
|
||
Cloze
|
||
In general, ontologists often categorize things as either {concreta} or {abstracta}.
|
||
Reference: Nikk Effingham, _An Introduction to Ontology_ (Cambridge: Polity Press, 2013).
|
||
<!--ID: 1720894782951-->
|
||
END%%
|
||
|
||
%%ANKI
|
||
Basic
|
||
Generally speaking, what does someone *probably* mean by "concrete" things?
|
||
Back: Things that exists in space and/or time.
|
||
Reference: Nikk Effingham, _An Introduction to Ontology_ (Cambridge: Polity Press, 2013).
|
||
<!--ID: 1720894782957-->
|
||
END%%
|
||
|
||
%%ANKI
|
||
Basic
|
||
Generally speaking, what does someone *probably* mean by "abstract" things?
|
||
Back: Things that exist in neither space nor time.
|
||
Reference: Nikk Effingham, _An Introduction to Ontology_ (Cambridge: Polity Press, 2013).
|
||
<!--ID: 1720894782965-->
|
||
END%%
|
||
|
||
%%ANKI
|
||
Basic
|
||
Is a material object considered concreta?
|
||
Back: Usually.
|
||
Reference: Nikk Effingham, _An Introduction to Ontology_ (Cambridge: Polity Press, 2013).
|
||
<!--ID: 1720894782971-->
|
||
END%%
|
||
|
||
%%ANKI
|
||
Basic
|
||
Is an immaterial object considered concreta?
|
||
Back: Possibly.
|
||
Reference: Nikk Effingham, _An Introduction to Ontology_ (Cambridge: Polity Press, 2013).
|
||
<!--ID: 1720894782978-->
|
||
END%%
|
||
|
||
%%ANKI
|
||
Basic
|
||
Is a material object considered abstracta?
|
||
Back: Not usually.
|
||
Reference: Nikk Effingham, _An Introduction to Ontology_ (Cambridge: Polity Press, 2013).
|
||
<!--ID: 1720894782984-->
|
||
END%%
|
||
|
||
%%ANKI
|
||
Basic
|
||
Is an immaterial object considered abstracta?
|
||
Back: Possibly.
|
||
Reference: Nikk Effingham, _An Introduction to Ontology_ (Cambridge: Polity Press, 2013).
|
||
<!--ID: 1720894782989-->
|
||
END%%
|
||
|
||
## Bibliography
|
||
|
||
* Nikk Effingham, _An Introduction to Ontology_ (Cambridge: Polity Press, 2013).
|
||
* Simon Hewitt, “A Cardinal Worry for Permissive Metaontology,” _Metaphysica_ 16, no. 2 (September 18, 2015): 159–65, [https://doi.org/10.1515/mp-2015-0009](https://doi.org/10.1515/mp-2015-0009). |