4.1 KiB
| title | TARGET DECK | FILE TAGS | tags | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ontology | Obsidian::H&SS | ontology::philosophy |
|
Overview
Ontology is the philosophical study of being. Generally things are split into two broad categories: abstract and concrete things. These words are "terms of art" and their definition is not standardized in any way.
%%ANKI Basic What did Quine declare as the ontological question? Back: "What is there?" Reference: Simon Hewitt, “A Cardinal Worry for Permissive Metaontology,” Metaphysica 16, no. 2 (September 18, 2015): 159–65, https://doi.org/10.1515/mp-2015-0009.
END%%
%%ANKI Basic Who is attributed the ontological question? Back: Willard Van Orman Quine. Reference: Simon Hewitt, “A Cardinal Worry for Permissive Metaontology,” Metaphysica 16, no. 2 (September 18, 2015): 159–65, https://doi.org/10.1515/mp-2015-0009.
END%%
%%ANKI Cloze {Ontology} is the {philosophical study of being}. Reference: Nikk Effingham, An Introduction to Ontology (Cambridge: Polity Press, 2013).
END%%
%%ANKI Cloze {Epistemology} is the {philosophical study of knowledge}. Reference: Nikk Effingham, An Introduction to Ontology (Cambridge: Polity Press, 2013).
END%%
%%ANKI Cloze {Taxonomy} is the {branch of science concerned with categorization}. Reference: Nikk Effingham, An Introduction to Ontology (Cambridge: Polity Press, 2013).
END%%
%%ANKI Cloze {Mereology} is the {philosophical study of part-whole relationships}. Reference: Nikk Effingham, An Introduction to Ontology (Cambridge: Polity Press, 2013).
END%%
%%ANKI Basic What does Effingham mean when saying "concreta" and "abstracta" are terms of art? Back: They are terms defined freely by a person to mean whatever one wants. Reference: Nikk Effingham, An Introduction to Ontology (Cambridge: Polity Press, 2013).
END%%
%%ANKI Cloze In general, ontologists often categorize things as either {concreta} or {abstracta}. Reference: Nikk Effingham, An Introduction to Ontology (Cambridge: Polity Press, 2013).
END%%
%%ANKI Basic Generally speaking, what does someone probably mean by "concrete" things? Back: Things that exists in space and/or time. Reference: Nikk Effingham, An Introduction to Ontology (Cambridge: Polity Press, 2013).
END%%
%%ANKI Basic Generally speaking, what does someone probably mean by "abstract" things? Back: Things that exist in neither space nor time. Reference: Nikk Effingham, An Introduction to Ontology (Cambridge: Polity Press, 2013).
END%%
%%ANKI Basic Is a material object considered concreta? Back: Usually. Reference: Nikk Effingham, An Introduction to Ontology (Cambridge: Polity Press, 2013).
END%%
%%ANKI Basic Is an immaterial object considered concreta? Back: Possibly. Reference: Nikk Effingham, An Introduction to Ontology (Cambridge: Polity Press, 2013).
END%%
%%ANKI Basic Is a material object considered abstracta? Back: Not usually. Reference: Nikk Effingham, An Introduction to Ontology (Cambridge: Polity Press, 2013).
END%%
%%ANKI Basic Is an immaterial object considered abstracta? Back: Possibly. Reference: Nikk Effingham, An Introduction to Ontology (Cambridge: Polity Press, 2013).
END%%
Bibliography
- Francesco Orilia and Michele Paolini Paoletti, “Properties,” in The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, ed. Edward N. Zalta, Spring 2022 (Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University, 2022), https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2022/entries/properties/.
- Nikk Effingham, An Introduction to Ontology (Cambridge: Polity Press, 2013).
- Simon Hewitt, “A Cardinal Worry for Permissive Metaontology,” Metaphysica 16, no. 2 (September 18, 2015): 159–65, https://doi.org/10.1515/mp-2015-0009.