Reorganize ontology/RDF/XML.
parent
217f84f12d
commit
f3af058a9f
|
@ -967,7 +967,7 @@
|
|||
"_journal/2024-11/2024-11-20.md": "951b6034d60a40dbd8201c50abf0dbb9",
|
||||
"_journal/2024-11/2024-11-19.md": "d879f57154cb27cb168eb1f1f430e312",
|
||||
"set/cardinality.md": "270b48a3559c055cb15216f70101ecc2",
|
||||
"geometry/area.md": "dc362cb5be314b2b9e4ecc53f2289af0",
|
||||
"geometry/area.md": "7f947bb5ac782495a1fb4a63bb2463e7",
|
||||
"_journal/2024-11-23.md": "911f82ab8aede5ecdb96493aef64b0b9",
|
||||
"_journal/2024-11/2024-11-22.md": "51117030e2364dbce3a8d507dead86ae",
|
||||
"_journal/2024-11-24.md": "225661114ad1b605132873e83acdf777",
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -8,5 +8,5 @@ title: "2024-07-28"
|
|||
- [ ] Sheet Music (10 min.)
|
||||
- [ ] Korean (Read 1 Story)
|
||||
|
||||
* Initial notes on [[ontology/rdf/index|RDF]].
|
||||
* Initial notes on [[rdf|RDF]].
|
||||
* Notes and flashcards on [[uri|URIs]].
|
|
@ -6,4 +6,7 @@ title: "2024-12-12"
|
|||
- [x] KoL
|
||||
- [x] OGS
|
||||
- [ ] Sheet Music (10 min.)
|
||||
- [ ] Korean (Read 1 Story)
|
||||
- [ ] Korean (Read 1 Story)
|
||||
|
||||
* Notes on monotone property of area.
|
||||
* Initial proofs on some properties of integrals of step functions.
|
Before Width: | Height: | Size: 18 KiB After Width: | Height: | Size: 18 KiB |
|
@ -1,9 +1,8 @@
|
|||
---
|
||||
title: RDF
|
||||
TARGET DECK: Obsidian::STEM
|
||||
FILE TAGS: ontology::rdf
|
||||
FILE TAGS: rdf
|
||||
tags:
|
||||
- ontology
|
||||
- rdf
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
|
@ -3,7 +3,6 @@ title: Uniform Resource Identifiers
|
|||
TARGET DECK: Obsidian::STEM
|
||||
FILE TAGS: uri
|
||||
tags:
|
||||
- rdf
|
||||
- uri
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
|
@ -189,6 +189,98 @@ Reference: Tom M. Apostol, _Calculus, Vol. 1: One-Variable Calculus, with an Int
|
|||
<!--ID: 1732381333365-->
|
||||
END%%
|
||||
|
||||
This property lets us prove $\varnothing$ is measurable with the expected area: $$a(\varnothing) = a(T - T) = a(T) - a(T) = 0$$
|
||||
|
||||
%%ANKI
|
||||
Basic
|
||||
Is the empty set considered measurable?
|
||||
Back: Yes.
|
||||
Reference: Tom M. Apostol, _Calculus, Vol. 1: One-Variable Calculus, with an Introduction to Linear Algebra_, 2nd ed. (New York: Wiley, 1980).
|
||||
<!--ID: 1734013716384-->
|
||||
END%%
|
||||
|
||||
%%ANKI
|
||||
Basic
|
||||
Which axiom of area is used to prove $\varnothing$ is measurable?
|
||||
Back: The difference property.
|
||||
Reference: Tom M. Apostol, _Calculus, Vol. 1: One-Variable Calculus, with an Introduction to Linear Algebra_, 2nd ed. (New York: Wiley, 1980).
|
||||
<!--ID: 1734013716403-->
|
||||
END%%
|
||||
|
||||
%%ANKI
|
||||
Basic
|
||||
What does $a(\varnothing)$ evaluate to?
|
||||
Back: $0$
|
||||
Reference: Tom M. Apostol, _Calculus, Vol. 1: One-Variable Calculus, with an Introduction to Linear Algebra_, 2nd ed. (New York: Wiley, 1980).
|
||||
<!--ID: 1734013716406-->
|
||||
END%%
|
||||
|
||||
%%ANKI
|
||||
Basic
|
||||
What chain of equalities is used to prove that $a(\varnothing) = 0$?
|
||||
Back: For any $T \in \mathscr{M}$, $a(\varnothing) = a(T - T) = a(T) - a(T) = 0$.
|
||||
Reference: Tom M. Apostol, _Calculus, Vol. 1: One-Variable Calculus, with an Introduction to Linear Algebra_, 2nd ed. (New York: Wiley, 1980).
|
||||
<!--ID: 1734013716410-->
|
||||
END%%
|
||||
|
||||
This property also lets us state the **monotone property**: $$\forall S, T \in \mathscr{M}, S \subseteq T \Rightarrow a(S) \leq a(T)$$
|
||||
|
||||
%%ANKI
|
||||
Basic
|
||||
What does the monotone property of area state in FOL?
|
||||
Back: $\forall S, T \in \mathscr{M}, S \subseteq T \Rightarrow a(S) \leq a(T)$
|
||||
Reference: Tom M. Apostol, _Calculus, Vol. 1: One-Variable Calculus, with an Introduction to Linear Algebra_, 2nd ed. (New York: Wiley, 1980).
|
||||
<!--ID: 1734013716414-->
|
||||
END%%
|
||||
|
||||
%%ANKI
|
||||
Basic
|
||||
What name is given to the following property? $$\forall S, T \in \mathscr{M}, S \subseteq T \Rightarrow a(S) \leq a(T)$$
|
||||
Back: The monotone property.
|
||||
Reference: Tom M. Apostol, _Calculus, Vol. 1: One-Variable Calculus, with an Introduction to Linear Algebra_, 2nd ed. (New York: Wiley, 1980).
|
||||
<!--ID: 1734013767208-->
|
||||
END%%
|
||||
|
||||
%%ANKI
|
||||
Basic
|
||||
Which axiom(s) of area are used to prove the monotone property?
|
||||
Back: The nonnegative and difference properties.
|
||||
Reference: Tom M. Apostol, _Calculus, Vol. 1: One-Variable Calculus, with an Introduction to Linear Algebra_, 2nd ed. (New York: Wiley, 1980).
|
||||
<!--ID: 1734013716417-->
|
||||
END%%
|
||||
|
||||
%%ANKI
|
||||
Basic
|
||||
Let $S, T \in \mathscr{M}$ such that $S \subseteq T$. Why is the difference property needed to show $a(T - S) \geq 0$?
|
||||
Back: It states $T - S$ is measurable.
|
||||
Reference: Tom M. Apostol, _Calculus, Vol. 1: One-Variable Calculus, with an Introduction to Linear Algebra_, 2nd ed. (New York: Wiley, 1980).
|
||||
<!--ID: 1734013716421-->
|
||||
END%%
|
||||
|
||||
%%ANKI
|
||||
Basic
|
||||
Let $S, T \in \mathscr{M}$ such that $S \subseteq T$. Why is the difference property needed to show $a(S - T) \geq 0$?
|
||||
Back: N/A. The difference property says nothing about $S - T$.
|
||||
Reference: Tom M. Apostol, _Calculus, Vol. 1: One-Variable Calculus, with an Introduction to Linear Algebra_, 2nd ed. (New York: Wiley, 1980).
|
||||
<!--ID: 1734013716426-->
|
||||
END%%
|
||||
|
||||
%%ANKI
|
||||
Basic
|
||||
Let $S, T \in \mathscr{M}$ such that $T \subseteq S$. Why is the difference property needed to show $a(S - T) \geq 0$?
|
||||
Back: It states $S - T$ is measurable.
|
||||
Reference: Tom M. Apostol, _Calculus, Vol. 1: One-Variable Calculus, with an Introduction to Linear Algebra_, 2nd ed. (New York: Wiley, 1980).
|
||||
<!--ID: 1734013716430-->
|
||||
END%%
|
||||
|
||||
%%ANKI
|
||||
Basic
|
||||
Let $S, T \in \mathscr{M}$ such that $S \subseteq T$. Why is the nonnegative property needed to show $a(T - S) \geq 0$?
|
||||
Back: It states the area of any measurable set is $\geq 0$.
|
||||
Reference: Tom M. Apostol, _Calculus, Vol. 1: One-Variable Calculus, with an Introduction to Linear Algebra_, 2nd ed. (New York: Wiley, 1980).
|
||||
<!--ID: 1734013716434-->
|
||||
END%%
|
||||
|
||||
### Invariance Under Congruence
|
||||
|
||||
If $S \in \mathscr{M}$ and $T$ is congruent to $S$, then $T \in \mathscr{M}$ and $a(S) = a(T)$.
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -1,3 +1,124 @@
|
|||
---
|
||||
title: Ontology
|
||||
TARGET DECK: Obsidian::H&SS
|
||||
FILE TAGS: ontology
|
||||
tags:
|
||||
- ontology
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Overview
|
||||
|
||||
Ontology is the philosophical study of being. Generally *things* are split into two broad categories: **abstract** and **concrete** things. These words are "terms of art" and their definition is not standardized in any way.
|
||||
|
||||
%%ANKI
|
||||
Basic
|
||||
What did Quine declare as *the* ontological question?
|
||||
Back: "What is there?"
|
||||
Reference: Simon Hewitt, “A Cardinal Worry for Permissive Metaontology,” _Metaphysica_ 16, no. 2 (September 18, 2015): 159–65, [https://doi.org/10.1515/mp-2015-0009](https://doi.org/10.1515/mp-2015-0009).
|
||||
<!--ID: 1720912238054-->
|
||||
END%%
|
||||
|
||||
%%ANKI
|
||||
Basic
|
||||
Who is attributed *the* ontological question?
|
||||
Back: Willard Van Orman Quine.
|
||||
Reference: Simon Hewitt, “A Cardinal Worry for Permissive Metaontology,” _Metaphysica_ 16, no. 2 (September 18, 2015): 159–65, [https://doi.org/10.1515/mp-2015-0009](https://doi.org/10.1515/mp-2015-0009).
|
||||
<!--ID: 1720912259767-->
|
||||
END%%
|
||||
|
||||
%%ANKI
|
||||
Cloze
|
||||
{Ontology} is the {philosophical study of being}.
|
||||
Reference: Nikk Effingham, _An Introduction to Ontology_ (Cambridge: Polity Press, 2013).
|
||||
<!--ID: 1720912238058-->
|
||||
END%%
|
||||
|
||||
%%ANKI
|
||||
Cloze
|
||||
{Epistemology} is the {philosophical study of knowledge}.
|
||||
Reference: Nikk Effingham, _An Introduction to Ontology_ (Cambridge: Polity Press, 2013).
|
||||
<!--ID: 1720912238062-->
|
||||
END%%
|
||||
|
||||
%%ANKI
|
||||
Cloze
|
||||
{Taxonomy} is the {branch of science concerned with categorization}.
|
||||
Reference: Nikk Effingham, _An Introduction to Ontology_ (Cambridge: Polity Press, 2013).
|
||||
<!--ID: 1720912238066-->
|
||||
END%%
|
||||
|
||||
%%ANKI
|
||||
Cloze
|
||||
{Mereology} is the {philosophical study of part-whole relationships}.
|
||||
Reference: Nikk Effingham, _An Introduction to Ontology_ (Cambridge: Polity Press, 2013).
|
||||
<!--ID: 1720998380912-->
|
||||
END%%
|
||||
|
||||
%%ANKI
|
||||
Basic
|
||||
What does Effingham mean when saying "concreta" and "abstracta" are terms of art?
|
||||
Back: They are terms defined freely by a person to mean whatever one wants.
|
||||
Reference: Nikk Effingham, _An Introduction to Ontology_ (Cambridge: Polity Press, 2013).
|
||||
<!--ID: 1720894782942-->
|
||||
END%%
|
||||
|
||||
%%ANKI
|
||||
Cloze
|
||||
In general, ontologists often categorize things as either {concreta} or {abstracta}.
|
||||
Reference: Nikk Effingham, _An Introduction to Ontology_ (Cambridge: Polity Press, 2013).
|
||||
<!--ID: 1720894782951-->
|
||||
END%%
|
||||
|
||||
%%ANKI
|
||||
Basic
|
||||
Generally speaking, what does someone *probably* mean by "concrete" things?
|
||||
Back: Things that exists in space and/or time.
|
||||
Reference: Nikk Effingham, _An Introduction to Ontology_ (Cambridge: Polity Press, 2013).
|
||||
<!--ID: 1720894782957-->
|
||||
END%%
|
||||
|
||||
%%ANKI
|
||||
Basic
|
||||
Generally speaking, what does someone *probably* mean by "abstract" things?
|
||||
Back: Things that exist in neither space nor time.
|
||||
Reference: Nikk Effingham, _An Introduction to Ontology_ (Cambridge: Polity Press, 2013).
|
||||
<!--ID: 1720894782965-->
|
||||
END%%
|
||||
|
||||
%%ANKI
|
||||
Basic
|
||||
Is a material object considered concreta?
|
||||
Back: Usually.
|
||||
Reference: Nikk Effingham, _An Introduction to Ontology_ (Cambridge: Polity Press, 2013).
|
||||
<!--ID: 1720894782971-->
|
||||
END%%
|
||||
|
||||
%%ANKI
|
||||
Basic
|
||||
Is an immaterial object considered concreta?
|
||||
Back: Possibly.
|
||||
Reference: Nikk Effingham, _An Introduction to Ontology_ (Cambridge: Polity Press, 2013).
|
||||
<!--ID: 1720894782978-->
|
||||
END%%
|
||||
|
||||
%%ANKI
|
||||
Basic
|
||||
Is a material object considered abstracta?
|
||||
Back: Not usually.
|
||||
Reference: Nikk Effingham, _An Introduction to Ontology_ (Cambridge: Polity Press, 2013).
|
||||
<!--ID: 1720894782984-->
|
||||
END%%
|
||||
|
||||
%%ANKI
|
||||
Basic
|
||||
Is an immaterial object considered abstracta?
|
||||
Back: Possibly.
|
||||
Reference: Nikk Effingham, _An Introduction to Ontology_ (Cambridge: Polity Press, 2013).
|
||||
<!--ID: 1720894782989-->
|
||||
END%%
|
||||
|
||||
## Bibliography
|
||||
|
||||
* Francesco Orilia and Michele Paolini Paoletti, “Properties,” in _The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy_, ed. Edward N. Zalta, Spring 2022 (Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University, 2022), [https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2022/entries/properties/](https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2022/entries/properties/).
|
||||
* Nikk Effingham, _An Introduction to Ontology_ (Cambridge: Polity Press, 2013).
|
||||
* Simon Hewitt, “A Cardinal Worry for Permissive Metaontology,” _Metaphysica_ 16, no. 2 (September 18, 2015): 159–65, [https://doi.org/10.1515/mp-2015-0009](https://doi.org/10.1515/mp-2015-0009).
|
|
@ -1,124 +0,0 @@
|
|||
---
|
||||
title: Ontology
|
||||
TARGET DECK: Obsidian::H&SS
|
||||
FILE TAGS: ontology::philosophy
|
||||
tags:
|
||||
- ontology
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Overview
|
||||
|
||||
Ontology is the philosophical study of being. Generally *things* are split into two broad categories: **abstract** and **concrete** things. These words are "terms of art" and their definition is not standardized in any way.
|
||||
|
||||
%%ANKI
|
||||
Basic
|
||||
What did Quine declare as *the* ontological question?
|
||||
Back: "What is there?"
|
||||
Reference: Simon Hewitt, “A Cardinal Worry for Permissive Metaontology,” _Metaphysica_ 16, no. 2 (September 18, 2015): 159–65, [https://doi.org/10.1515/mp-2015-0009](https://doi.org/10.1515/mp-2015-0009).
|
||||
<!--ID: 1720912238054-->
|
||||
END%%
|
||||
|
||||
%%ANKI
|
||||
Basic
|
||||
Who is attributed *the* ontological question?
|
||||
Back: Willard Van Orman Quine.
|
||||
Reference: Simon Hewitt, “A Cardinal Worry for Permissive Metaontology,” _Metaphysica_ 16, no. 2 (September 18, 2015): 159–65, [https://doi.org/10.1515/mp-2015-0009](https://doi.org/10.1515/mp-2015-0009).
|
||||
<!--ID: 1720912259767-->
|
||||
END%%
|
||||
|
||||
%%ANKI
|
||||
Cloze
|
||||
{Ontology} is the {philosophical study of being}.
|
||||
Reference: Nikk Effingham, _An Introduction to Ontology_ (Cambridge: Polity Press, 2013).
|
||||
<!--ID: 1720912238058-->
|
||||
END%%
|
||||
|
||||
%%ANKI
|
||||
Cloze
|
||||
{Epistemology} is the {philosophical study of knowledge}.
|
||||
Reference: Nikk Effingham, _An Introduction to Ontology_ (Cambridge: Polity Press, 2013).
|
||||
<!--ID: 1720912238062-->
|
||||
END%%
|
||||
|
||||
%%ANKI
|
||||
Cloze
|
||||
{Taxonomy} is the {branch of science concerned with categorization}.
|
||||
Reference: Nikk Effingham, _An Introduction to Ontology_ (Cambridge: Polity Press, 2013).
|
||||
<!--ID: 1720912238066-->
|
||||
END%%
|
||||
|
||||
%%ANKI
|
||||
Cloze
|
||||
{Mereology} is the {philosophical study of part-whole relationships}.
|
||||
Reference: Nikk Effingham, _An Introduction to Ontology_ (Cambridge: Polity Press, 2013).
|
||||
<!--ID: 1720998380912-->
|
||||
END%%
|
||||
|
||||
%%ANKI
|
||||
Basic
|
||||
What does Effingham mean when saying "concreta" and "abstracta" are terms of art?
|
||||
Back: They are terms defined freely by a person to mean whatever one wants.
|
||||
Reference: Nikk Effingham, _An Introduction to Ontology_ (Cambridge: Polity Press, 2013).
|
||||
<!--ID: 1720894782942-->
|
||||
END%%
|
||||
|
||||
%%ANKI
|
||||
Cloze
|
||||
In general, ontologists often categorize things as either {concreta} or {abstracta}.
|
||||
Reference: Nikk Effingham, _An Introduction to Ontology_ (Cambridge: Polity Press, 2013).
|
||||
<!--ID: 1720894782951-->
|
||||
END%%
|
||||
|
||||
%%ANKI
|
||||
Basic
|
||||
Generally speaking, what does someone *probably* mean by "concrete" things?
|
||||
Back: Things that exists in space and/or time.
|
||||
Reference: Nikk Effingham, _An Introduction to Ontology_ (Cambridge: Polity Press, 2013).
|
||||
<!--ID: 1720894782957-->
|
||||
END%%
|
||||
|
||||
%%ANKI
|
||||
Basic
|
||||
Generally speaking, what does someone *probably* mean by "abstract" things?
|
||||
Back: Things that exist in neither space nor time.
|
||||
Reference: Nikk Effingham, _An Introduction to Ontology_ (Cambridge: Polity Press, 2013).
|
||||
<!--ID: 1720894782965-->
|
||||
END%%
|
||||
|
||||
%%ANKI
|
||||
Basic
|
||||
Is a material object considered concreta?
|
||||
Back: Usually.
|
||||
Reference: Nikk Effingham, _An Introduction to Ontology_ (Cambridge: Polity Press, 2013).
|
||||
<!--ID: 1720894782971-->
|
||||
END%%
|
||||
|
||||
%%ANKI
|
||||
Basic
|
||||
Is an immaterial object considered concreta?
|
||||
Back: Possibly.
|
||||
Reference: Nikk Effingham, _An Introduction to Ontology_ (Cambridge: Polity Press, 2013).
|
||||
<!--ID: 1720894782978-->
|
||||
END%%
|
||||
|
||||
%%ANKI
|
||||
Basic
|
||||
Is a material object considered abstracta?
|
||||
Back: Not usually.
|
||||
Reference: Nikk Effingham, _An Introduction to Ontology_ (Cambridge: Polity Press, 2013).
|
||||
<!--ID: 1720894782984-->
|
||||
END%%
|
||||
|
||||
%%ANKI
|
||||
Basic
|
||||
Is an immaterial object considered abstracta?
|
||||
Back: Possibly.
|
||||
Reference: Nikk Effingham, _An Introduction to Ontology_ (Cambridge: Polity Press, 2013).
|
||||
<!--ID: 1720894782989-->
|
||||
END%%
|
||||
|
||||
## Bibliography
|
||||
|
||||
* Francesco Orilia and Michele Paolini Paoletti, “Properties,” in _The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy_, ed. Edward N. Zalta, Spring 2022 (Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University, 2022), [https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2022/entries/properties/](https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2022/entries/properties/).
|
||||
* Nikk Effingham, _An Introduction to Ontology_ (Cambridge: Polity Press, 2013).
|
||||
* Simon Hewitt, “A Cardinal Worry for Permissive Metaontology,” _Metaphysica_ 16, no. 2 (September 18, 2015): 159–65, [https://doi.org/10.1515/mp-2015-0009](https://doi.org/10.1515/mp-2015-0009).
|
|
@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
|
|||
---
|
||||
title: Properties
|
||||
TARGET DECK: Obsidian::H&SS
|
||||
FILE TAGS: ontology::philosophy
|
||||
FILE TAGS: ontology
|
||||
tags:
|
||||
- ontology
|
||||
---
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue