/- # References 1. Avigad, Jeremy. ‘Theorem Proving in Lean’, n.d. -/ -- Exercise 1 -- -- Go back to the exercises in Chapter 3 and Chapter 4 and redo as many as you -- can now with tactic proofs, using also `rw` and `simp` as appropriate. namespace ex1 -- Exercises 3.1 section ex3_1 variable (p q r : Prop) -- Commutativity of ∧ and ∨ example : p ∧ q ↔ q ∧ p := by apply Iff.intro · intro ⟨hp, hq⟩ exact ⟨hq, hp⟩ · intro ⟨hq, hp⟩ exact ⟨hp, hq⟩ example : p ∨ q ↔ q ∨ p := by apply Iff.intro · intro | Or.inl hp => exact Or.inr hp | Or.inr hq => exact Or.inl hq · intro | Or.inl hq => exact Or.inr hq | Or.inr hp => exact Or.inl hp -- Associativity of ∧ and ∨ example : (p ∧ q) ∧ r ↔ p ∧ (q ∧ r) := by apply Iff.intro · intro ⟨⟨hp, hq⟩, hr⟩ exact ⟨hp, hq, hr⟩ · intro ⟨hp, hq, hr⟩ exact ⟨⟨hp, hq⟩, hr⟩ example : (p ∨ q) ∨ r ↔ p ∨ (q ∨ r) := by apply Iff.intro · intro | Or.inl (Or.inl hp) => exact Or.inl hp | Or.inl (Or.inr hq) => exact Or.inr (Or.inl hq) | Or.inr hr => exact Or.inr (Or.inr hr) · intro | Or.inl hp => exact Or.inl (Or.inl hp) | Or.inr (Or.inl hq) => exact Or.inl (Or.inr hq) | Or.inr (Or.inr hr) => exact Or.inr hr -- Distributivity example : p ∧ (q ∨ r) ↔ (p ∧ q) ∨ (p ∧ r) := by apply Iff.intro · intro | ⟨hp, Or.inl hq⟩ => exact Or.inl ⟨hp, hq⟩ | ⟨hp, Or.inr hr⟩ => exact Or.inr ⟨hp, hr⟩ · intro | Or.inl ⟨hp, hq⟩ => exact ⟨hp, Or.inl hq⟩ | Or.inr ⟨hp, hr⟩ => exact ⟨hp, Or.inr hr⟩ example : p ∨ (q ∧ r) ↔ (p ∨ q) ∧ (p ∨ r) := by apply Iff.intro · intro | Or.inl hp => exact ⟨Or.inl hp, Or.inl hp⟩ | Or.inr ⟨hq, hr⟩ => exact ⟨Or.inr hq, Or.inr hr⟩ · intro | ⟨Or.inl hp, _⟩ => exact Or.inl hp | ⟨Or.inr _, Or.inl hp⟩ => exact Or.inl hp | ⟨Or.inr hq, Or.inr hr⟩ => exact Or.inr ⟨hq, hr⟩ -- Other properties example : (p → (q → r)) ↔ (p ∧ q → r) := by apply Iff.intro · intro h ⟨hp, hq⟩ exact h hp hq · intro h hp hq exact h ⟨hp, hq⟩ example : ((p ∨ q) → r) ↔ (p → r) ∧ (q → r) := by apply Iff.intro · intro h apply And.intro · intro hp exact h (Or.inl hp) · intro hq exact h (Or.inr hq) · intro ⟨hpr, hqr⟩ h apply Or.elim h · intro hp exact hpr hp · intro hq exact hqr hq example : ¬(p ∨ q) ↔ ¬p ∧ ¬q := by apply Iff.intro · intro h apply And.intro · intro hp exact h (Or.inl hp) · intro hq exact h (Or.inr hq) · intro ⟨np, nq⟩ intro | Or.inl hp => exact absurd hp np | Or.inr hq => exact absurd hq nq example : ¬p ∨ ¬q → ¬(p ∧ q) := by intro | Or.inl np => intro h; exact absurd h.left np | Or.inr nq => intro h; exact absurd h.right nq example : ¬(p ∧ ¬p) := by intro ⟨hp, np⟩ exact absurd hp np example : p ∧ ¬q → ¬(p → q) := by intro ⟨hp, nq⟩ h exact absurd (h hp) nq example : ¬p → (p → q) := by intro np hp exact absurd hp np example : (¬p ∨ q) → (p → q) := by intro | Or.inl np => intro hp; exact absurd hp np | Or.inr hq => exact fun _ => hq example : p ∨ False ↔ p := by apply Iff.intro · intro | Or.inl hp => exact hp | Or.inr ff => exact False.elim ff · intro hp exact Or.inl hp example : p ∧ False ↔ False := by apply Iff.intro · intro ⟨_, ff⟩ exact ff · intro ff exact False.elim ff example : (p → q) → (¬q → ¬p) := by intro hpq nq hp exact absurd (hpq hp) nq end ex3_1 -- Exercises 3.2 section ex3_2 open Classical variable (p q r s : Prop) example (hp : p) : (p → r ∨ s) → ((p → r) ∨ (p → s)) := by intro h apply (h hp).elim · intro hr exact Or.inl (fun _ => hr) · intro hs exact Or.inr (fun _ => hs) example : ¬(p ∧ q) → ¬p ∨ ¬q := by intro h apply (em p).elim · intro hp apply (em q).elim · intro hq exact False.elim (h ⟨hp, hq⟩) · intro nq exact Or.inr nq · intro np exact Or.inl np example : ¬(p → q) → p ∧ ¬q := by intro h apply And.intro · apply byContradiction intro np apply h intro hp exact absurd hp np · intro hq apply h intro _ exact hq example : (p → q) → (¬p ∨ q) := by intro hpq apply (em p).elim · intro hp exact Or.inr (hpq hp) · intro np exact Or.inl np example : (¬q → ¬p) → (p → q) := by intro hqp hp apply byContradiction intro nq exact absurd hp (hqp nq) example : p ∨ ¬p := by apply em example : (((p → q) → p) → p) := by intro h apply (em p).elim · intro hp exact hp · intro np apply h intro hp exact absurd hp np end ex3_2 -- Exercises 3.3 section ex3_3 variable (p : Prop) example (hp : p) : ¬(p ↔ ¬p) := by intro h exact absurd hp (h.mp hp) end ex3_3 -- Exercises 4.1 section ex4_1 variable (α : Type _) variable (p q : α → Prop) example : (∀ x, p x ∧ q x) ↔ (∀ x, p x) ∧ (∀ x, q x) := by apply Iff.intro · intro h apply And.intro · intro hx; exact And.left (h hx) · intro hx; exact And.right (h hx) · intro h hx have lhs : ∀ (x : α), p x := And.left h have rhs : ∀ (x : α), q x := And.right h exact ⟨lhs hx, rhs hx⟩ example : (∀ x, p x → q x) → (∀ x, p x) → (∀ x, q x) := by intro h₁ h₂ hx exact h₁ hx (h₂ hx) example : (∀ x, p x) ∨ (∀ x, q x) → ∀ x, p x ∨ q x := by intro | Or.inl h => intro hx; exact Or.inl (h hx) | Or.inr h => intro hx; exact Or.inr (h hx) end ex4_1 -- Exercises 4.2 section ex4_2 variable (α : Type _) variable (p q : α → Prop) variable (r : Prop) example : α → ((∀ _ : α, r) ↔ r) := by intro ha apply Iff.intro · intro har apply har exact ha · intro hr _ exact hr section open Classical example : (∀ x, p x ∨ r) ↔ (∀ x, p x) ∨ r := by apply Iff.intro · intro h apply (em r).elim · intro hr exact Or.inr hr · intro nr apply Or.inl · intro hx apply (h hx).elim · exact id · intro hr exact absurd hr nr · intro h₁ hx apply h₁.elim · intro h₂ exact Or.inl (h₂ hx) · intro hr exact Or.inr hr end example : (∀ x, r → p x) ↔ (r → ∀ x, p x) := by apply Iff.intro · intro h hr hx exact h hx hr · intro h hx hr exact h hr hx end ex4_2 -- Exercises 4.3 section ex4_3 open Classical variable (men : Type _) variable (barber : men) variable (shaves : men → men → Prop) example (h : ∀ x : men, shaves barber x ↔ ¬ shaves x x) : False := by apply (em (shaves barber barber)).elim · intro hb exact absurd hb ((h barber).mp hb) · intro nb exact absurd ((h barber).mpr nb) nb end ex4_3 -- Exercises 4.5 section ex4_5 open Classical variable (α : Type _) variable (p q : α → Prop) variable (r s : Prop) example : (∃ _ : α, r) → r := by intro ⟨_, hr⟩ exact hr example (a : α) : r → (∃ _ : α, r) := by intro hr exact ⟨a, hr⟩ example : (∃ x, p x ∧ r) ↔ (∃ x, p x) ∧ r := by apply Iff.intro · intro ⟨hx, hp, hr⟩ exact ⟨⟨hx, hp⟩, hr⟩ · intro ⟨⟨hx, hp⟩, hr⟩ exact ⟨hx, hp, hr⟩ example : (∃ x, p x ∨ q x) ↔ (∃ x, p x) ∨ (∃ x, q x) := by apply Iff.intro · intro | ⟨hx, Or.inl hp⟩ => exact Or.inl ⟨hx, hp⟩ | ⟨hx, Or.inr hq⟩ => exact Or.inr ⟨hx, hq⟩ · intro | Or.inl ⟨hx, hp⟩ => exact ⟨hx, Or.inl hp⟩ | Or.inr ⟨hx, hq⟩ => exact ⟨hx, Or.inr hq⟩ example : (∀ x, p x) ↔ ¬(∃ x, ¬p x) := by apply Iff.intro · intro ha ⟨hx, np⟩ exact absurd (ha hx) np · intro he hx apply byContradiction intro np exact he ⟨hx, np⟩ example : (∃ x, p x) ↔ ¬(∀ x, ¬p x) := by apply Iff.intro · intro ⟨hx, hp⟩ h exact absurd hp (h hx) · intro h₁ apply byContradiction intro h₂ apply h₁ intro hx hp exact h₂ ⟨hx, hp⟩ example : (¬∃ x, p x) ↔ (∀ x, ¬p x) := by apply Iff.intro · intro h hx hp exact h ⟨hx, hp⟩ · intro h ⟨hx, hp⟩ exact absurd hp (h hx) theorem forall_negation : (¬∀ x, p x) ↔ (∃ x, ¬p x) := by apply Iff.intro · intro h₁ apply byContradiction intro h₂ exact h₁ (fun (x : α) => by apply byContradiction intro np exact h₂ ⟨x, np⟩) · intro ⟨hx, np⟩ h exact absurd (h hx) np example : (¬∀ x, p x) ↔ (∃ x, ¬p x) := forall_negation α p example : (∀ x, p x → r) ↔ (∃ x, p x) → r := by apply Iff.intro · intro h ⟨hx, hp⟩ exact h hx hp · intro h hx hp exact h ⟨hx, hp⟩ example (a : α) : (∃ x, p x → r) ↔ (∀ x, p x) → r := by apply Iff.intro · intro ⟨hx, hp⟩ h apply hp exact h hx · intro h₁ apply (em (∀ x, p x)).elim · intro h₂ exact ⟨a, fun _ => h₁ h₂⟩ · intro h₂ have ⟨hx, np⟩ : (∃ x, ¬p x) := (forall_negation α p).mp h₂ exact ⟨hx, fun hp => absurd hp np⟩ example (a : α) : (∃ x, r → p x) ↔ (r → ∃ x, p x) := by apply Iff.intro · intro ⟨hx, h⟩ hr exact ⟨hx, h hr⟩ · intro h apply (em r).elim · intro hr have ⟨hx, hp⟩ := h hr exact ⟨hx, fun _ => hp⟩ · intro nr exact ⟨a, fun hr => absurd hr nr⟩ end ex4_5 end ex1 -- Exercise 2 -- -- Use tactic combinators to obtain a one line proof of the following: namespace ex2 example (p q r : Prop) (hp : p) : (p ∨ q ∨ r) ∧ (q ∨ p ∨ r) ∧ (q ∨ r ∨ p) := by simp [*] end ex2